Article View: dc.talk.guns
Article #2110Re: TAX handguns
From: Michael Phelps
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1993 13:19
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1993 13:19
116 lines
4941 bytes
4941 bytes
In article <93087.205644WCBANTA@auvm.american.edu>,
WCBANTA@auvm.american.edu (William C. Banta) writes:
|> Handguns cause billions of dollars in damage every year by making
|> murder and blood easy
|> Why should manuacturers and buyers not pay
|> their fair share of that cost? Why not tax hand guns at the point of
|> manufacture - say $1,500 per Saturday night special?
First of all, whats a "Saturday Night Special"? I've heard the term used
but i've never been able to actually get an objective definition of one.
Secondly, whats wrong with holding people responsible for their actions?
Consider that, for most people [1] who wish to legally own a handgun they
have to [at a minumum] establish that they are not criminals or adjudicated
mentally incompetent. Therefore, i contend that the *legal* purchasers
are not the problem; thus the tax should be applied to illegal purchasers;
thats a bit tougher to collect (and may well infringe on their right to
avoid self incrimination).
Please note that is is already illegal to purchase a handgun out of your
state of residence [and has been since 1968]; it is, in fact, a federal
felony.
|> Why not tax
|> permits for owning a handdgun. Really sock it to sellers.
Actually this really socks it to the *legal* purchasers, who are seldom
responsible for the murder and mayhem. Consider the statistics in Florida
wrt CCW permit holders:
From the "Concealed Weapons / Firearms License
Statistical Report for the Period 10/01/87 - 10/31/91" issued by:
Florida Department of State's Division of Licensing
P.O. Box 6687,
Tallahassee, FL 32314-6687
This one-page report states as follows:
112,528 Applications Received
85,662 New
26,866 Renewal
109,377 Licenses Issued
82,756 New
26,621 Renewal
768 Applications Denied
446 Criminal History
302 Incomplete Application
167 Licenses Revoked
66 Clemency rule change or legislative change
77 Crime after licensure (10 = firearm utilized)
6 Crime prior to licensure (2 = firearm utilized)
10 Illegible prints with no response
8 Other
12 Reinstated (no statistics maintained prior to Jan. '90)
----------- These stats are the sum total of the report ------------
What this amounts to is:
167 licenses revoked = .15% (one-sixth of 1%) of licenses issued
i.e. 15 in 10,000 licenses were revoked
77 licenses revoked for a crime after licensure = .07% (seven hundreths
of 1%)
i.e. only 7 in 10,000 licenses were revoked for a crime
10 licenses revoked for crime with a gun = .009%
i.e. less than 1 in 10,000 licenses were revoked for a crime with a gun
So, you'd advocate "socking it to all the license holders, although
99.991% of them didn't commit any firearm related crime? Seems rather
extreme to me. Would you support "socking it to" everyone who purchases
any kind of item that is used to harm others? Kitchen knives? Alcohol?
Baseball bats (especially those black "assault bats")? Fuel oil and
fertalizer (the ammonium nitrate makes great bombs)? Golf clubs? Cars?
How about if we work on swift, sure, and severe punishment for those
who violate the law? That would benefit everyone; a violent criminal
taken out of society -- reguardless of their methods -- creates a better
and safer society.
I'm willing to be held responsible for my actions. I am not responsible
for your actions - you are. If I screw up, i'll be punished, not you.
If you screw up, you get punished, not me.. deal?
michael
=======================================================================
[1] more than half of the population lives in or near "metropolitan areas",
most of which have some sort of handgun probibition (DC), virtual
prohibition (Chicago, New York City), or licensing (LA, et al).
Generally the surrounding areas also have some sort of licensing as
well (i.e. New York state, Massachusetts, Va).
--
Michael Phelps, (external) mjp@vnet.ibm.com ..
(internal) mjp@bwa.kgn.ibm.com .. mjp at kgnvmy
(and last but not least a disclaimer) These opinions are mine..
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Mar29.131913.21245@watson.ibm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews.watson.ibm.com!watson!mjpReferences:
<93087.205644WCBANTA@auvm.american.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10162c,92f52f469aafcdfa X-Google-Attributes: gid10162c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-29 05:43:44 PST Newsgroups: dc.talk.guns Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews.watson.ibm.com!watson!mjp From: mjp@austin.ibm.com (Michael Phelps) Subject: Re: TAX handguns Originator: mjp@bwa.kgn.ibm.com Sender: @watson.ibm.com Message-ID: <1993Mar29.131913.21245@watson.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 93 13:19:13 GMT Reply-To: mjp@vnet.ibm.com (Michael J. Phelps) References: <93087.205644WCBANTA@auvm.american.edu> Organization: IBM Kingston NY Lines: 116