Re: Gun control

Article View: dc.talk.guns

Article #2192

#2192

From: Kevin Cameron
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1993 03:14

22 lines
1221 bytes

In article <1993Jan29.203115.43961@watson.ibm.com>, mjp@austin.ibm.com  (Michael J. Phelps) writes:
>
> ........
> 
> if the law isn't being enforced, it should either be 
>  a. enforced
>  b. repealed 
> 
> if the law is enforced, and found to be ineffective, it should be repealed.
> 
> Neither case (IMHO) is a very good argument for writing YAL (Yet Another Law).

More laws may help enforce those which are ineffective - but well-intentioned.



DC & NYC laws don't work because they are local, not because they are bad laws.


Kev.
--

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Feb4.031456.15807@clsi.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!clsi!kevin

References:

<1951@tnc.UUCP> <1k8sagINNasc@sol.tis.com> <WARSAW.93Jan29104821@anthem.nlm.nih.gov> <1993Jan29.203115.43961@watson.ibm.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10162c,4a32fb18f6632e11
X-Google-Attributes: gid10162c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-18 09:58:54 PST
Newsgroups: dc.talk.guns
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!clsi!kevin
From: kevin@clsi.COM (Kevin Cameron)
Subject: Re: Gun control
Message-ID: <1993Feb4.031456.15807@clsi.COM>
Originator: kevin@dubhe
Sender: usenet@clsi.COM
Reply-To: kevin@clsi.com
Organization: CAD Language Systems Inc.
References: <1951@tnc.UUCP> <1k8sagINNasc@sol.tis.com> <WARSAW.93Jan29104821@anthem.nlm.nih.gov> <1993Jan29.203115.43961@watson.ibm.com>
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 93 03:14:56 GMT
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message