Article View: dc.talk.guns
Article #2202Re: figures for gun-fetiscists
From: Michael Phelps
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1993 19:28
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1993 19:28
125 lines
6175 bytes
6175 bytes
In article <1993Mar10.161419.10152@apgea.army.mil>, ahgrabow@apgea.army.mil (Alexander H. Grabowski <ahgrabow>) writes:
|> Hello, guys,
|>
|> I just heard some very interesting numbers on WBAL's morning show
|> with Uncel Al. I think, they perhaps might wake up some people-
|> but perhaps I am too optimistic.
|>
|> Facts:
|>
|> Every year, more US-citizens are killed by guns than during
|> the whole, 10-year vietnam war (then: ~53.000).
Some numbers:
Murders and non-negligent manslaughters known to police (1990)
Total: 20,045
using a firearm: 12,847 (64% of the total)
[BJS Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Stats, 1991 ISBN 0-16040397-0, page 400]
accidental deaths: falling from ~3000 [1932] to ~1400 [1987], while the
population rose about 20x. In units of deaths per
100k, thats 24.03 [1932] to 5.74 [1987]. SOurce sez BOC,
and i can't remember what that means!
suicide: can't find the number; its higher than the accident+murder+nnm rate
.. there are about 30k suicides [all types, not just firearms]/yr.
note that many countries have higher suicide rates -and- more
restrictive firearms laws (see Japan).
|>
|> The murder rate in Great Britain is about 350/year. That is less
|> than in Balto city alone.
|>
|> Considering that Great Britains has not less than 1/5 of the
|> population of the US that would result in a murder rate of
|> 1750 per year in the US.
|>
|> Compare that to more than 50.000!
1. compare that to 12,847, since thats the murder/nnm number.
2. The entire GB murder/nnm number is < the US NON-firearm number
(20,045-12,847 = 7198). Clearly the difference between GB and the US
involves more than just firearms.
By the way, GB's violent crime rate is rising - see the newspapers within
the last week. The US murder/nnm rate rose from '60 to '80, fell to '85,
then rose again; the number is still under the max rate in 1980
[BJS sourcebook, ibid]. During this time, practically every piece of
federal gun control legislation passed during the 20th century has been
enacted, centering around 1968. There wasn't even a slight dip following
the gca '68.
3. the accidential death rate due to firearms is less than the accidental death
rate from falls, drowning, fires, poison and choking.
|>
|> You simply can't brake the laws of logic- more guns out in the streat
|> definitely means more killings.
Coincidently, the time served for violent crime has dropped since 1950, while
the crime rate has risen: Murder 1.8 yrs served
Rape ~9 months
Robbery ~3 months
Car theft 3 days [NBC 9 Dec 1992 for 1990 year]
..federal tends to be higher, states lower
coincidence? I don't think so.
As a noted criminoligist (Prof Gary Kleck, FSU) put it - the deterrent effect
of punishment is directly related to certainty, severity, and celarity
(promptness). Right now we are 0 for 3.
I think that we could deal with the problem of criminals attempting to purchase
handguns legally with an point of sale background check, but we keep getting
"Brady Bills" instead - as an aside, the house version (HR.277 this year) still
doesn't mandate a background check, just a waiting period. I find bills like
that to be disengenuous at best.
|>
|>
|> And, yes, I know what is going to come.
|> - the right to bear arms (this right refers to the purpose of bearing
|> arms, too: *exclusively* to defend this country)
|> - All bad guys will not respect.......
|> - All good guys will be helpless......
|> - I don't know what I am talking about....
|> - One of these days I might be happy if the 'free militia' saves my a**...
and you didn't get any of that from me, did you? Check out my numbers, the call
is free:
BJS 1-800-732-3277
see the following books [not written by the NRA or HCI]:
Under the Gun [1983] Wright, Rossi, Daley
The Gun Control Debate - you decide [1991?]: Les Nesbit
Point Blank - guns and violence in America: Gary Kleck
Armed and Considered Dangerous: Wright and Rossi
|>
|> Because it has become a habit for one of the more frequent posters here
|> to quote Robert A. Heinlein, let me make a quote from a SF-novel too:
|> 'Oh, Holy St. Leibovitz, let them dream on!'
|> (WHo said that, BTW? )
|>
|> Regards
|>
|> Alexander
|> __________________________________________________________________
|> | Don't call us, we will call you | Ain't got no brains. |
|> | Don't flame me, I won't flame you | Ain't got no opinion. |
|> | | Ain't got nuttin' to be |
|> | ahgrabow@cbda8.apgea.army.mil | held responsible for. |
|> | |
|> | Only narrow-minded people care about typos. |
|> | (James Michener) |
|> |________________________________________________________________|
--
Michael Phelps, (external) mjp@vnet.ibm.com ..
(internal) mjp@bwa.kgn.ibm.com .. mjp at kgnvmy
(and last but not least a disclaimer) These opinions are mine..
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Mar10.192808.7070@watson.ibm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews.watson.ibm.com!watson!mjpReferences:
<1993Mar10.161419.10152@apgea.army.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10162c,78ab9087c515afbd X-Google-Attributes: gid10162c,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,78ab9087c515afbd X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-10 12:35:15 PST Newsgroups: dc.talk.guns,dc.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews.watson.ibm.com!watson!mjp From: mjp@austin.ibm.com (Michael Phelps) Subject: Re: figures for gun-fetiscists Originator: mjp@bwa.kgn.ibm.com Sender: @watson.ibm.com Message-ID: <1993Mar10.192808.7070@watson.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 93 19:28:08 GMT Distribution: usa Reply-To: mjp@vnet.ibm.com (Michael J. Phelps) References: <1993Mar10.161419.10152@apgea.army.mil> Organization: IBM Kingston NY Lines: 125