Re: figures for gun-fetiscists

Article View: dc.talk.guns

Article #2205

#2205

From: Robert Felmey
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1993 05:34

21 lines
1501 bytes

dougnews@access.digex.com (Doug Humphrey) writes:
[DELETED]
>If you accept that prevention of deaths (we can say innocent 
>deaths or not...) is a correct and justifiable reason for 
>taking away access to something (guns for example) then how
>would you defend the availability of alchohol to the public?
>Look at drunk driving deaths and tell me why guns should go, 
>but booze should not?  In fact, maybe we should do the booze
>first?

>Doug
>-- 
Or, continuing with that ?LOGIC? why not just make automobiles in
general illegal?  Even the amount of deaths by auto NOT INVOLVING
alcohol is extremely high.  
 
Is your "license" (it's not actually a right) to drive more important
than my right to own whatever weapon a may or may not wish to?
 
Rob
---

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Mar.11.00.34.14.1993.3804@clam.rutgers.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!clam.rutgers.edu!felmey

References: <1993Mar10.161419.10152@apgea.army.mil> <1nlbd4INN3oq@access.digex.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10162c,78ab9087c515afbd
X-Google-Attributes: gid10162c,public
X-Google-Thread: 101049,78ab9087c515afbd
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-10 21:54:47 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!clam.rutgers.edu!felmey
From: felmey@clam.rutgers.edu (Robert Felmey)
Newsgroups: dc.talk.guns,dc.general
Subject: Re: figures for gun-fetiscists
Message-ID: <Mar.11.00.34.14.1993.3804@clam.rutgers.edu>
Date: 11 Mar 93 05:34:14 GMT
References: <1993Mar10.161419.10152@apgea.army.mil> <1nlbd4INN3oq@access.digex.com>
Followup-To: dc.talk.guns
Distribution: usa
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message