🚀 go-pugleaf

USA_First wrote:
> 
> In article <300519991339013022%shrapnel@LICEenteract.com>,
>   Allen James <shrapnel@LICEenteract.com> wrote:
> > In article <7irqtl$ns$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, USA_First
> > <usa_first@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <374F633D.9E39331@bga.com>,
> > >   Jim Herring <mustang@bga.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > It ain't murder if he's in the act of robbing from the home.
> > > >
> > >
> > > You seem confused.  Robbery is basically taking property from
> another
> > > through force or fear.  Burglary is entering a dwelling to generally
> > > steal property.  One is in your face and the other is sneaky.
> > >
> > > What is making this difficult for you is the attempt to justify
> > > homicide for a simple theft.  Law (and common decency) prohibit such
> > > acts.
> > >
> >
> > Why do you believe an underage thief has more right to my home and my
> > property than I do?
> 
> When did I make that claim?
> 
> >Why do you believe I am not entitled to keep what I
> > earn, and to use force to stop others from taking my posessions?
> >
> 
> Because the law and decency prohibit you from shooting someone for
> taking property. 

Absolutely incorrect. The law and decency require that he not take my
property. 

"Remember, a ship in harbor is safe, but that is not
            what ships are built for."