Article View: dc.test
Article #155test of corrupted post (ignore this)
From: Fernando Pineda
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 14:46
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 14:46
133 lines
4520 bytes
4520 bytes
_____________________________ test post________________________________ My initial question about converting ppm CaCO3 to dKH resulted in an explanation of the qualitative facts about hardness and alkalinity. My request for the quantitative implications did not,however, meet with much success. So I dusted off my old chemistry books, went to the library, did a few experiments, and made some phone calls. The result of this little exercise in recreational science is a set of notes that may be useful to others who are trying to understand but if there is sufficient interest I will continu e to post my notes as I go along. SUMMARY There are two main sections her e. The first section summarizes the essential quantitative facts neede d to understand and visualize some aspects of water chemistry. The second section gives detailed information about test kits, i.e. what they actually measure and how they do it (chemistry!). This information wa s obtained by calling around to the manufacturers and discussing the ch emistry of their kits. Also several people contributed via e-mail. I onl y have experience with the LaMotte calcium kit so I may have missed s ome information on the other kits. LaMotte (and Hach) make test kits that measure total Calcium in solution and test kits that measure both Ca lcium and total hardness. With the latter kits you can estimate magnesiu m hardness too, but this is not too useful for aquarists. For people that ha ve Ca hardness test kits I describe a delightful experiment that illustrate s how the buffering effect of CaCO3 maintains the level of free Ca++ ions in solution. It demonstrates that that the time scale of the CaCO3 eq 6 The terms "Carbonate Hardness" and "Ca rbonate Alkalinity" are identical. They both refer to HCO3- and CO3-- co ncentrations. Measurements of these quantities are only indirectly relat ed to the amount of calcium in the water through the reaction CaCO3 + CO2 + H2O <=> Ca++ + 2[ HCO3-]. Thiel refers exclusively to dKH in his book (Advanced Reef Keeping). He gives 18.9 as the conversion f actor to go from dKH to ppm CaCO3. Two points here. First, Thiel's ca rbonate hardness test kit actually measures total alkalinity but the d ifference between total alkalinity and carbonate hardness is only abou t 3%, so for us aquarists, there's no point in making an issue of it. S econd, according to Thiel, you can convert from his dKH figures t o total alkalinity in ppm CaCO3 by multiplying the dKH figure by 18.9. I work through a detailed example calculation below. Moe and Thiel don't completely agree on their ppm CaCO3 to dKH conversion factors. Moe give s the conversion factor as 17.9 or 1/0.05 = 20, Thiel says 18.9. The d ifference may be related to the ~3% difference between total and alkali nity and carbonate alkalinity, but without further information I can't de nd to Ca anation of the "gotcha' s " involved in these conversions. Also, I'm still looking for more detaile d data on the following test kits: Hach, Tetra, others?. If folks woul d provide me with customer service telephone numbers and as much informat ion about a particular kit as they have, I can try to follow through an d get more detailed information on their kits. I might add that, I don't hav e infinite funds to spend on phone bills, so if anyone else feels motivate d to call and get information on a particular test kit , that would help out considerably. ___________________________ ______ _____________________________ NOTES ___________________________ ___________________________________ DEFINITIONS , WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Concentrations are often stated as mill igrams (mg) per liter (l) of fluid so the units are (mg/l). One li ter of water weighs almost exactly 1 kg = 1000 grams . So concentrations ar e often given in terms of (mg/kg). Now a milligram is 1/1000000 of a kg or 1 part per million ( 1 ppm). So f or our purposes, we have that
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BxGEDM.BLy@netnews.jhuapl.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!netnews!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: dc.test Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!netnews!news From: fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Fernando Pineda) Subject: test of corrupted post (ignore this) Message-ID: <BxGEDM.BLy@netnews.jhuapl.edu> Sender: usenet@netnews.jhuapl.edu Reply-To: fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Fernando Pineda) Organization: Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Labs Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 14:46:33 GMT Lines: 133