Re: Standleitung

Article View: de.comm.misc

Article #301

#301

From: Bodo Rueskamp
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 11:48

11 lines
804 bytes

In article <BssMyI.EFG@flatlin.ka.sub.org> bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org (Christoph Badura) writes:
>*DIE* FTZ-Nummer wurde letzten Sommer kommentarlos fuer eine
>Standleitung akzeptiert.

Dann sind eben die Dortmunder Telekomiker 'n bischen pingeliger...

; Bodo

-- 
--
Bodo Rueskamp, DG3YGD, br@Germany.EU.net, "F Y CN RD THS Y MST B SNG NX"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1689e2INNbe2@disaster.Germany.EU.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!email!news.univie.ac.at!Germany.EU.net!br

References: <15uqi4INN6vk@smurf.smurf.sub.org> <165e68INN6d9@disaster.Germany.EU.net> <BssMyI.EFG@flatlin.ka.sub.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!email!news.univie.ac.at!Germany.EU.net!br
From: br@Germany.EU.net (Bodo Rueskamp)
Newsgroups: de.comm.misc
Subject: Re: Standleitung
Date: 11 Aug 1992 11:48:18 GMT
Organization: EUnet-Backbone, Germany
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <1689e2INNbe2@disaster.Germany.EU.net>
References: <15uqi4INN6vk@smurf.smurf.sub.org> <165e68INN6d9@disaster.Germany.EU.net> <BssMyI.EFG@flatlin.ka.sub.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: walhalla.germany.eu.net

Reply to Parent Message