Re: Is the STL too authentic... ?

Article View: de.comp.lang.c++

Article #102

#102

From: Lars Farm
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 1995 10:29

13 lines
1006 bytes

In article <DG010o.LFK@research.att.com>,
ark@research.att.com (Andrew Koenig) wrote:

>Again, I think implementations that check the rules at run time are
>a Good Thing, especialy if you can afford them.  But sometimes you can't.

In those few cases, I'd turn checking of selectively after testing and
profiling. That is, I would if I could. It's always off in all my
compilers:-( Why not reserve a #pragma for this? imho no range check by
default is a premature optimization.

--
Lars Farm, lars.farm@nts.mh.se

Technical Details

Message-ID: <AC9C151B9668D9B8@sleipner.nts.mh.se>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fizban.solace.mh.se!user

References:

<5vE-N3F6nTB@site71.ping.at> <DFxJ75.3w0@research.att.com> <KANZE.95Oct5121708@slsvgqt.lts.sel.alcatel.de> <DG010o.LFK@research.att.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fizban.solace.mh.se!user
From: lars.farm@nts.mh.se (Lars Farm)
Newsgroups: de.comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Is the STL too authentic... ?
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 1995 11:29:31 +0100
Organization: pv
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <AC9C151B9668D9B8@sleipner.nts.mh.se>
References: <5vE-N3F6nTB@site71.ping.at> <DFxJ75.3w0@research.att.com> <KANZE.95Oct5121708@slsvgqt.lts.sel.alcatel.de> <DG010o.LFK@research.att.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: @sleipner.nts.mh.se

Reply to Parent Message