Article View: de.comp.lang.c++
Article #106Re: Is the STL too authentic... ?
From: Kennel
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1995 20:02
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1995 20:02
23 lines
1241 bytes
1241 bytes
Andrew Koenig (ark@research.att.com) wrote: > Indeed. > Again, I think implementations that check the rules at run time are > a Good Thing, especialy if you can afford them. But sometimes you can't. Distinguish from: ''Implementations that have a library are a Good Thing, especially if you can afford them. But sometimes you can't.'' please... ------------------ Why go through the effort of making a standard library, along with academically funded widely available reference implementations, without a peep on the most minimal provisions for safety? > -- > --Andrew Koenig > ark@research.att.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<45bv4n$a2e@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!stc06.ctd.ornl.gov!mbkReferences:
<5vE-N3F6nTB@site71.ping.at> <DFxJ75.3w0@research.att.com> <KANZE.95Oct5121708@slsvgqt.lts.sel.alcatel.de> <DG010o.LFK@research.att.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!stc06.ctd.ornl.gov!mbk From: mbk@jt3ws1.etd.ornl.gov (Kennel) Newsgroups: de.comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Is the STL too authentic... ? Followup-To: de.comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c++ Date: 9 Oct 1995 20:02:31 GMT Organization: Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN Message-ID: <45bv4n$a2e@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov> References: <5vE-N3F6nTB@site71.ping.at> <DFxJ75.3w0@research.att.com> <KANZE.95Oct5121708@slsvgqt.lts.sel.alcatel.de> <DG010o.LFK@research.att.com> Reply-To: kennel@msr.epm.ornl.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: jt3ws1.etd.ornl.gov X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]