Article View: de.comp.lang.c++
Article #96Re: Is the STL too authentic... ?
From: Matt Austern
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1995 07:27
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1995 07:27
17 lines
1672 bytes
1672 bytes
In article <5vE-N3F6nTB@site71.ping.at> wsog@site71.ping.at (Walter Sommergruber) writes: > It think it's always better to think a few minutes about bad errors rather > than hoping that it will never happen... > Send a message and then shutdown the program (closing files, releasing OS- > resources,...). Or do you like core dumps so much ? There's a lot to say for core dumps, actually. If you have a development environment and an operating system that supports core dumps in the first palce, then there's probably a lot of useful information in a core dump that can tell you just what went wrong where. Printing out an error message and dumping core might not be a very slick way of dealing with fatal errors, but you can do worse. -- Matt Austern He showed his lower teeth. "We matt@physics.berkeley.edu all have flaws," he said, "and http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt mine is being wicked."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MATT.95Oct4002748@godzilla.EECS.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!agate!mattReferences:
<5v6uCdN6nTB@site71.ping.at> <DFtqtz.C91@research.att.com> <44romb$lsf@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <DFwJu1.w9@research.att.com> <5vE-N3F6nTB@site71.ping.at>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!agate!matt From: matt@godzilla.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (Matt Austern) Newsgroups: de.comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Is the STL too authentic... ? Date: 04 Oct 1995 07:27:48 GMT Organization: University of California at Berkeley (computational neuroscience) Message-ID: <MATT.95Oct4002748@godzilla.EECS.Berkeley.EDU> References: <5v6uCdN6nTB@site71.ping.at> <DFtqtz.C91@research.att.com> <44romb$lsf@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <DFwJu1.w9@research.att.com> <5vE-N3F6nTB@site71.ping.at> Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: godzilla.eecs.berkeley.edu In-reply-to: wsog@site71.ping.at's message of 04 Oct 1995 08:05:00 +0200