🚀 go-pugleaf

boring



In message <agvv8o$jeb$5338@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net>, jvb <jvb@hereinsa.net> 
writes
>A Fish Out Of Water (racism and other myths)
>
>"True wisdom is not manifested in trying to see resemblances in things
>that differ. But in discerning the real difference among those things that
>resemble one another"
>
>When did the responsibility for the evolution of African people (and other
>recently discovered primitive races) become the responsibility of the first
>world, and the 'Whites' in particular?
>
>They blame the whites for underdevelopment, but how much development did they
>manage before the colonists arrived?  The development of the western
>infrastructure has taken place over thousands of years. They now expect this
>same infrastructure to be created and financed for them by the
>west- immediately!
>
>Anyone who knows of the disparity that existed when the first settlers landed
>in Africa, or other primitive areas, will realise that this disadvantage is not
> the result of colonization, or anything else, other than evolution.
> Their lack of progress or inventiveness since the dawn of mankind is proof
> enough of that.
>
> Everything they have has been handed to them on a plate by the white
> colonists, even the aircraft which they now fly around in to demand even more.
> We owe them nothing !!
>
>This stunted (by European standards) evolutionary path is now blamed on
>'Whites', and a concerted attempt is being made to instill a guilt complex on
>the 'Whites', under the pretext that they would be on a par if it were not for
>colonization and slavery.
>
>When in truth, while left undisturbed by white colonists for millions of years,
>their rate of progress or change was insignificant. The wheel was unknown to
>them, they had no written language and processes which they stumbled
>across, such as ore extraction, were never refined or improved etc. etc…).
>
>In contrast, the Western World progressed in leaps and bounds. Their shelter
>construction techniques are even borrowed from the nest building methods of the
>local birds.
>They just do not have enquiring or inventive characteristics. Nor do they have
>an industrious or charitable bone in their bodies.
>
>The cradle of mankind is southern Africa, and it is no coincidence that the
>further away from it you move, the more progress took place.
>It is because the genetically and intellectually more advanced and hence more
>inventive, inquisitive, and industrious members of our ancestors explored and
>migrated, while the dormant ones remained where they were.
>
>If it were not for 'White' colonists they would still be ignorant of the
>technological and scientific achievements of the first world, which they now
>envy but fail to understand and are generally unable to achieve.
>
>Primitive instincts of reproduction, lack of sexual control, tolerance of
>violence, brutality, and self-interest, are natural for their position on the
>evolutionary curve.
>
>In the environment that would prevail in Africa, if it were not for Western
>influence/interference, they would be attributes essential to survival.
>Their evolutionary path has made them more adapted to survival and physical
>activities.
>
>The natural attrition from famine, plague etc. which nature uses to maintain a
>balance, has been disrupted by Western technology. (Without time for the
>natural evolutionary adjustment of the reproductive rate to take place.)
>It is by means of western medicine, agriculture, peacekeeping efforts, 
>aid, etc.
>coupled with their inability to overcome primitive reproductive instincts, that
>they have multiplied to the point that the continent can no longer support
>their numbers.
>
>This is not to say that one evolutionary path is better than the other.
>However the path taken by the 'White', and Eastern, races has resulted in them
>developing an environment and culture tailored to their own development, and
>the African races, for theirs.
>
>Thousands of years of evolutionary progress and technological advancement was
>thrust on them in the blink of an eye, on the timeline of evolution.
>
>This has resulted in the 'Fish Out Of Water' syndrome, which we see today with
>respect to Africa, African people and other tribes of recently 
>primitive origin,
>when trying to impersonate the western way of life.
>
>The more advanced along the evolutionary curve a race or tribe was when the
>western world arrived on their doorstep, the better they are able to assimilate
>into our environment and culture.
>
>It is also the reason that, as soon as the environment shifts/deteriorates back
>to what is more suitable to the skills, characteristics and morals of the
>indigenous people, the Whites/settlers become the 'Fish Out Of Water', are
>unable to survive, and generally migrate to environments more compatible with
>their cultural evolution and concept of morals and rights.
>This then results in a faster regression, (or is it just the return to
>normality and suitability for the indigenous people?).
>
>The difference between their concept of morals and ours is vast.
>
>We have western governments trying to force democracy on them, regardless of
>the fact that they do not understand the principle, as can be seen by the civil
>wars which erupt after every (usually rigged) election.
>Why would they embrace democracy? When historically their lives and cultures
>have been controlled by autocratic kings and chiefs- and still are, regardless
>of the veil of democracy put in place to appease the West.
>
>This superficial democracy is only tolerated because it is seen as a
>requirement to access the aid, wealth and trappings of the western cultures.
>When combined with the rampant bribery, corruption and incompetence of the
>elected officials (elected through intimidation and vote rigging, easily
>accomplished with this underlying structure) it is farcical.
>
>The quality of a democracy is proportional to the collective intelligence of
>the electorate.
>
>Democracy in Africa is the election of the incompetent and corrupt by the i
>gnorant and illiterate.
>
>We Prop up, enforce and subsidise systems, which are foreign to them-just
>because it offends our principles and morals.
>
>Recent tradition was/is such that if you wanted/needed something, which another
>chief/tribe had, you simply gathered your army and conducted a raid.
>The cattle, women, food, etc. were then yours. (These being the prized
>possessions of the evolutionary period - and generally still are)
>Selfishness, violence, theft (our definitions) etc. are not faults in their
>indigenous environment, but essential components of the survival skills that
>they have evolved in order to cope in this harsh and unforgiving
>environment, which existed when they were discovered by the western world.
>
>Why do we have more concern for their suffering than their own do? The images
>of starving or homeless children etc. are paraded as a means to access our
>generosity. While they themselves care little. There is always an abundance of
>money for arms etc. to ensure that they stay in power.
>
>Most of these children have been abandoned or orphaned as a result of their
>primitive characteristics (self-interest, violence, etc.). Any aid received is
>usually stolen, sold on the black market or misappropriated.
>
>They wail constantly about human rights, equality etc. when they themselves
>rule through brutality and intimidation and are so racist that it extends down
>to tribal intolerance.
>
>They do not share the generosity or charity of the ' Whites' especially in
>times of shortages (a permanent feature of Africa now, due to overpopulation).
>They have however become masters at the art of manipulating this failing of the
>'Whites'.
>
>Making full use of our religious principles and the much-misunderstood notion
>of equality.
>
>Any notion of equality (of man or anything else in nature) other than in a
>religious context- is absurd. Not even identical twins are equal.
>If equality were a reality, then the process of natural selection would be
>nullified. And all evolution would end.
>
>Even more absurd is the misconception that this equality can be achieved
>through education. If education could override evolution, then anyone could be
>taught to be a DaVinci, Einstein, Johnson or Jordan etc. or one could teach a
>Zebra to be a Racehorse.
>
>Education Is No Substitute For Evolution!!!!!!
>
>The concept of (religious) equality has been subverted and distorted and used
>mainly by the communists to de-stabilize the colonies and mixed societies
>(so called freedom struggles etc.) so they themselves could gain a strategic
>advantage.
>
>This misconstrued version of equality was embraced by the ignorant, the
>gullible and the greedy.
>
>Another misconstrued and abused concept is 'Racism'. It is natural for groups,
>with similar cultures and interests, to have an affinity for each other and to
>congregate and associate along these lines.  This occurs as much amongst a
>group of mixed nationality or mixed interest white group as it does amongst
>a mixed ethnic or white/ethnic group.
>
>However, when there happens when other races present it is no longer natural,
>but racist!
>Why are there no quotas, affirmative action etc. for other nationalities, races
>etc? Why only for blacks?
>
>A joke may be made about the Irish, Australian, French, etc. In fact anyone
>other than a black race or nationality- this is suddenly Racist! This is just
>another component of the concerted effort to instill a guilt complex on the
>Western/White races, to disguise the inability of the recently primitive races
>to cope in the western environment and to force us to alter our environment so
>that they can cope, or to give them the benefits regardless of whether they
>cope or contribute or not.
>
>Why is it acceptable to have Black unions, business associations etc, or for
>blacks to dominate certain sports such as basketball? (Rightly so, since they
>have the best attributes and skills for these activities- just as it is right
>for other groups with different attributes and skills to dominate the fields
>which suit them)
>
>They are suspiciously quiet about the teams not being representative of the
>USA etc. No quotas asked for here!
>
>Louis Farrakan is entitled to his opinion (ask any black) but a white person
>is not entitled to these same opinions. This would be racist.
>
>As soon as any similar situation is reversed then it is Racist!!
>
>What happened to OUR rights to freedom of association?
>
>Just as the disabled person requires a permit/sticker to get preferential
>parking, access etc. - So should anyone else, requiring preferential treatment
>in the modern western world, admit that they cannot cope with the normal
>western environment- And wear the badge of their disability!! If they were
>equal then this would not be necessary.
>
>At first, slavery/racism was to blame, for an inability to cope and/or achieve
>in the technologically advanced environment of the western world. When racism
>was abolished and they were granted 'equal access' or 'equal opportunity'-(the
>only right anyone should have)- and still could not cope, the cry changed
>to 'affirmative action'.
>
>Now, those that have equal access, affirmative action and education, and still
>fail to achieve, demand that they be given the
>qualifications/positions/benefits etc. regardless (Quota's etc.), or that the
>standards be revised/reduced- resorting to violence and arson etc. (instinct)
>to realize their absurd demands, or simply obtain credentials through
>fraudulent means.
>The proliferation of fraudulent degrees, driver's licenses and now even pilots
>licenses is ample proof.
>
>The Soccer World Cup bid by South Africa is another example of the strategy of
>using guilt to achieve their goals. With claims of 'it is our turn',
>'racism', etc. and a total disregard for the technical quality of the
>other bids, they try to force acceptance of theirs.
>
>England lost out through a few hooligans- but the World is expected to ignore
>the violent, murderous anarchy and crime in Southern Africa.
>
>Even a halfwit can see where the projections of current trends of crime,
>violence, rape, aids, instability, etc. lead to in 2010.
>Only a fool would commit to an event of this scale, in the distant future of
>such an unstable, deteriorating and mismanaged environment.
>Just as after any other lost election, there in no acceptance of the process or
>outcome, nor any dignity in defeat. We should be grateful however, that they
>have not initiated an armed (freedom?) struggle against the world soccer body,
>Germany or NZ for that matter.
>
>The attacks on busses by the taxi associations (and on each other) are another
>example of African free enterprise. Who needs advertising or competition when
>you have got an AK47?
>
>The quality of government is a reflection of the collective intelligence of the
>electorate - Just a cursory look around Africa will explain what you are
>dealing with. After demanding freedom etc. They screw up their own country then
>flood illegally into other countries to screw them up as well. (usually Western
>countries run by the whites which they despise)
>
>I may have equal access and rights to the Arctic, but I will never be 
>an Eskimo!
>If I should try, and not be able to cope with the demands of the arctic
>environment - do I have the right to demand that the environment be changed to
>compensate for my inabilities? Or that other competent Eskimos be excluded so
>that I may appear to be excelling. Then if this is not done- to claim that I am
>the victim of racism or otherwise disadvantaged.
>
>Should I contract AIDS through my inability to control my sexual urges, or I am
>a drug addict, do I then have the right to demand free medication and 
>treatment.
>Paid for with our hard earned tax dollars. You do not catch Aids- You have to
>go out and get it!!
>
>What about those with other illnesses, which are not self inflicted- Will this
>benefit be extended to them as well or are they now happy to again blatantly
>discriminate, as long as it benefits them.
>
>Are the drug companies going to give the same consideration to all the ill
>people of the world, or do they consider the lives and health of non aids
>sufferers to be of lesser value.
>
>Aids is a self inflicted and self eradicating disease. Nature is cleansing the
>planet of deviants and evolutionary retards, and restoring the balance which we
>have disturbed.
>
>Just let it run its course.
>
>If I insisted on working in a nuclear physics research environment but
>understood little of nuclear physics- should I demand that they revise their
>entrance requirements or research only basic elements?
>Why then, when certain groups fail to score as high as other groups, on the
>tests designed to access suitability for the technological Western environment,
>such as IQ etc.- do they claim that these tests are racist and demand that they
>are revised.
>
>The same applies to Western educational institutions designed to prepare one
>for the demands of a technological age.
>The list of examples of these anomalies is endless, yet we accept them daily.
>
>It is amazing how frequently the term 'DEMAND' is used by groups that have
>contributed little to, or even hindered, the progress of Modern Civilization.
>
>Even more unbelievable is how willing we are to consent to such demands, no
>matter how ludicrous!! Thereby hindering our progress still further.
>
>Instead of moving forward with our own culture, our time and efforts are being
>consumed by efforts to alter our society/environment to accommodate those who
>are foreign to it and who do not contribute to it.
>
>Is this an attempt to slow down our progress, in the hope that less evolved
>groups can catch up?
>Any environment or group, to which they are not suited or are unable to achieve
>in, is branded as racist.
>
>Consider the following scenario:-
>A genetically similar, but technologically superior, alien race arrives on our
>planet and promptly replaces all our familiar technology with theirs and alter
>our environment with new transport, construction and farming techniques etc.
>Our language and written communication is replaced with telepathy.
>This technology works on principles, which we are not yet able to 
>conceptualize.
>All control is achieved by means of mental telepathy etc. and a careless
>thought results in damage or catastrophe.
>They also replace all the familiar laws, rules and religious principles, with
>their own, the transgression of which results in swift retribution.
>All the necessary educational institutions are provided - where all lectures
>are presented telepathically on the assumption that we have evolved
>sufficiently to grasp their concepts.
>They then decide that we are their equals and charge us with the responsibility
>for this new environment. If anyone of them protests that we are not prepared
>(evolutionary) for the task, they are told that they are racist.
>How competent would we be in this environment?
>How frustrated?  -- 'Fish Out Of Water' perhaps?
>
>This is the equivalent experience of the more primitive groups.
>
>Unless we accept that we are different, (even genetically- hence the easy
>identification of race by forensics) have different needs and that we are not
>all comfortable, suited to, or able to cope, in the same environment- we cannot
>hope to avoid conflict. We need to stop forcing a foreign environment on others
>and above all stop trying to adopt a culture, which is unnatural, and then
>complain that they are disadvantaged.
>
>All the valid genetic, physiological and psychological studies that have been
>done which highlight the differences between the races have been covered up
>as racist.
>
>How much longer are we going to paint over hard facts with the brush of
>political correctness?
>
>There will always be exceptions in any group. Usually these are paraded as
>proof of equality. However neither nature, nor evolution is governed by
>exceptions. Which exception or oddball's characteristics would determine the
>environment for the rest of us?
>
>The Whites do not hold up Albert Einstein as an example of Joe Average!
>
>Any suitable environment will always be governed by and evolve to the average
>requirements of a particular group or species. Forced adaptation of our
>environment in an attempt to accommodate these races will simply retard western
>progress.
>
>Just consider the contribution to western progress and lifestyle the trillions
>of dollars, squandered in Africa in the futile attempts to drag them into the
>modern era, could have made.
>
>THESE ARE YOUR HARD EARNED TAX DOLLARS!!
>
>ANY attempt to create a single environment for everyone will of necessity be a
>retrograde step, and result in it not being ideally suited to anyone -
>Resulting in feelings of discrimination on all sides and conflict.
>
>How much longer are we going to keep our heads buried in the sand and ignore
>the obvious? Only a fool defies the laws of nature.
>
>Why are the so called aids activists not telling aids infected women to not get
>pregnant, instead of demanding that millions more of our tax dollars are
>wasted on useless free aids treatment- just to create a generation of orphans
>which will consume even more aid and who will probably infect themselves with
>aids by the time they are in their teens!
>
>We must apply our efforts to improving our environment and culture for
>ourselves and not allow our evolution and progress to be retarded by these
>groups. (Yes, evolution is an ongoing process)
>If they insist on trying to impersonate the western culture then it must simply
>be a case of 'sink or swim' or 'fit in or FO'. We must not sacrifice 
>our identity or allow our race/group to be swamped by foreign entities 
>because of our generosity
>
>Evolution will not respond to any 'DEMANDS'!!
>
>The concept of racism was created to avoid the myth of equality being exposed.
>
>Remember this document the next time you see a parasitic minority march or a
>demonstration trying to force their opinion on you or demanding that you hand
>over our resources for them to squander. ---
>
>If you had to run riot in the streets smashing windows, Looting, Burning
>cars etc. you would probably be shot. If however you were part of a minority
>mob (especially black) trying to negate democracy by forcing their opinion on
>others, then you would somehow be immune to prosecution.
>
>They expect the whites to grant them rights and priviledges which they do not
>grant each other  !!
>
>JVB
>
>"Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost
>inexpressible.
>It is Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world
>to itself.
>Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism,
>imperialism, and slavery have disappeared.
>The charge of racism puzzles Whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled
>good will, because they don't grasp what it really means: humiliation.
>The White man presents an image of superiority even when he isn't conscious
>of it. And superiority excites envy.
>Destroying White civilization is the innermost desire of the league of
>designated victims we call 'minorities.'"
>
>A WHITE COLONIST'S APOLOGY
>
> We white colonists wish to make a confession. We confess our sins against the
> black people of Africa (and those of our forefathers), which are outlined
> in detail below:-
>
> 1. We apologize for giving them doctors, new hospitals, medical services that
>    enabled them to survive plagues, disasters and to multiply into uncountable
>    numbers.
>2. We apologize for teaching them to read and write the English language and
>   even for putting their own languages down in writing for them. We even
>   taught them mathematics and built hundreds (if not thousands) of schools for
>   them even rebuilding and repairing same when they burnt them down or
>   vandalized them.
>3. We apologize for building factories and shops, which gave them work. We
>    apologize for taking them into our houses to work, giving them food and
>    even paying them.
> 4. We apologize for building farms out of barren bush and gardens from which
>     we fed them .
>5. We apologize for giving them clothes and shoes instead of leaving them in
>    the animal skins they wore before we found them wandering aimlessly around
>    the plains, mountains and valleys not having evolved sufficiently to invent
>    even the wheel or written language.
> 6. We apologize for extracting minerals from below the earth, minerals
>    which had always been there but were unknown to the local inhabitants.
>    We apologize for paying them to work in these mines.
>7. We apologize for those among us who established charity organizations to
>    feed and clothe them while they themselves never knew, or know now, the
>    meaning of charity.
>8. We apologize for building a network of roads all over the country which they
>    now use to give Africa one of the highest road accident rates in the world.
>
>9. We apologize for building huge dams which keep them supplied with fresh
>    water, even in times of drought.
>10. We apologize for paying the lion's share of the countries tax burden
>     while spending the least upon ourselves.
>11. We apologize for giving them modern construction techniques which enabled
>    them to move out of the mud and grass structures which they copied
>    from bird's nests.
>
> For all these evil sins we most humbly beg forgiveness, and if they will
> only accept our apologies, we will gladly take back all of the above
> mentioned evil deeds and leave them where and as we found them. !!!!
>
>
>The current inhabitants of Egypt had nothing to do with the creation of its
>constructions. Which is why they have no knowledge of their creation. 
>In fact it
>is western man who has provided the most insight into their mysteries, 
>including
>the ancient languages. Do you think that their ancestors just forgot to mention
>an achievement of that scale and significance? Did they forget to write down
>the details despite having invented the first known written language? They were
>either built by another race on their way north and who moved on, or who died
>out from disease. (the more likely scenario)
>The current inhabitants are merely nomads who stumbled across it.
>They are nothing more than squatters claiming credit for others achievements.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
David Turner