Re: Bug in DOS/DIS Unbatch?

Article View: demon.ip.developers

Article #1149

Back to demon.ip.developers Previous Next

#1149

From: Anthony R. Gold
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 00:00

19 lines
1354 bytes

In article <823977867snz@wash.demon.co.uk>
           john@wash.demon.co.uk "John Washington" writes:

> Anthony, It's interesting to note that you're posting
> with Snews 1.29, and presumably also using that version
> of unbatch.
> 
> The size of the relevant buffer was increased from 512 bytes
> to 1025 in 1.30.

The newer (May '95) Unbatch did indeed work.  Thanks.

Also, see the snappy new X-Newsreader: line above :-)

Regards,
-- 
   Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM                  email: tgold@panix.com
                                                tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk
                                        packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na

Technical Details

Message-ID: <824073488snz@microvst.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <823946625snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> <823977867snz@wash.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10bb05,13da3e1a671290a7
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb05,public
X-Google-Thread: fb525,13da3e1a671290a7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb525,public
From: "Anthony R. Gold" <tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug in DOS/DIS Unbatch?
Date: 1996/02/11
Message-ID: <824073488snz@microvst.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 138961327
x-nntp-posting-host: microvst.demon.co.uk
references: <823946625snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> <823977867snz@wash.demon.co.uk>
x-mail2news-path: microvst.demon.co.uk
organization: Microvest Limited, London
reply-to: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: demon.ip.developers,demon.ip.support.pc

Reply to Parent Message