Article View: demon.ip.developers
Article #150Re: RFC for ESMTP?
From: Chris Croughton
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00
16 lines
1318 bytes
1318 bytes
In article <112c938348.tom@compton.demon.co.uk>
tom@compton.demon.co.uk "Tom Hughes" wrote:
>1869 SMTP Service Extensions. J. Klensin, N. Freed, M. Rose, E.
> Stefferud & D. Crocker. November 1995. (Format: TXT=23299 bytes)
> (Obsoletes RFC1651) (Also STD0010) (Status: STANDARD)
>
>Plus all the others that define the various extensions themselves:
Ah, I was being too specific about 'extended' (and the link was too slow
to download everything). Now I just have to work out which of those is
not obsoleted by everything else (which gives me a reason to implement my
threatened RFC Index parser nad database)...
Thanks,
Chris C
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Snews.980911.072434.chris.10995@keris.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Snews.980910.175001.chris.10989@keris.demon.co.uk> <112c938348.tom@compton.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10bb05,5acfd064d0837c76 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb05,public From: chris@keris.demon.co.uk (Chris Croughton) Subject: Re: RFC for ESMTP? Date: 1998/09/11 Message-ID: <Snews.980911.072434.chris.10995@keris.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 390104007 X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!keris.ul.bawue.de References: <Snews.980910.175001.chris.10989@keris.demon.co.uk> <112c938348.tom@compton.demon.co.uk> X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 905520629 mail2news:2694 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk Organization: Keristor Systems Newsgroups: demon.ip.developers X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net