🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.ip.developers
Article #185

Sole Trader or Limited Co.?

#185
From: Martin Hooper
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 00:00
16 lines
1305 bytes
Hi,
I'm thinking about providing an MS Access database solution to UK local
authorities.  I initially thought that it would be essential to operate on
the basis of a limited Co. in order to protect me from personal liability in
the event of litigation.  However, when I went to one of these business
startup advisors, he said that this would not be necessary as even limited
status is no guarantee of freedom from personal liability in circumsances of
negligence etc.  Limited status clearly has the disadvantage of being more
expensive to administer.

I wonder if anyone could offer any advice regarding the pros and cons of
each approach?

Any advice gratefully accepted.

Martin Hooper
Technical Details
Message-ID: <912803652.29219.0.nnrp-06.c2de0eae@news.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10bb05,591d9e95b102ec4f,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb05,public
From: "Martin Hooper" <martin@burrypt.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Sole Trader or Limited Co.?
Date: 1998/12/04
Message-ID: <912803652.29219.0.nnrp-06.c2de0eae@news.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 418728344
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: burrypt.demon.co.uk:194.222.14.174
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 912803652 nnrp-06:29219 NO-IDENT burrypt.demon.co.uk:194.222.14.174
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Newsgroups: demon.ip.developers
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net