🚀 go-pugleaf

Richard Clayton wrote:

> "451 Nameserver timeout during parsing" I expect

That's the animal.  I can't verify the number, but I remember the
wording
(as it flashed by - only 25 lines and the message scrolled off too fast 
to capture).

> RFC readers will know that this behaviour is wrong :( but regulars will
> know that MMDF is not the best MTA ever :(. That said, this should not
> be happening - some logs of the failures would be useful. The best place
> to send details of_this_particular_fault! would be postmaster@demon.net.

OK, thanks.

> I am reliably informed that it will be nothing to do with the anti-spam
> changes (which were made in October), but investigating it is of
> interest (if you can produce the logs - see above).

Logs are a problem - I'm not there to do them, and (as far as I can
tell)
KA9Q doesn't log the SMTP traces.  Of course, I can modify the sources
and recompile with special traces in, but that will take quite a time...

I can try to do a special login from here (Germany) to get logs.

> You could also join the "testers" group, which would then allow you to
> use post.eng.mail.net, which runs a different MTA which could give you
> less problems -- different reporting arrangements exist for problems
> there, which is why joining the official group is important.

How do I do that?

Thanks,
    Chris C