🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <slrn68p8lu.d43.robm@desade.noc.demon.net>
           robm@demon.net "Robert Mortimer" writes:

> Given the recent excellent work by Graham with GremNOS, and the fact
> that I'm finally working on DNOS again, I was wondering if it would be
> useful, or just of interest, for those working on alternative versions
> of KA9Q to make a quick survey of what features people would like to
> see included in KA9Q.
> 
>  I mainly do DNOS for my own use, but like to make a generically
> useful compile available, so such information would be of use to me.
> If this sort of information would be useful to other people as well,
> and if no one has any objections I'll put together a simple
> questionaire based on config.h and post it to dispc and
> demon.ip.developers weekly till the new year /* is that long enough to
> many posts? */ and then compile the results and post them back here.

It does sound useful, but your reference to config.h sounds like this 
survey might only identify components present and maybe not revisions 
that have been made to any of each of these: some nntp's have 
authentication and some smtp's have esmtp. And then there are 
additional matters such as command line rescroll and better ppp 
negotiation as well as bug reductions.

I would welcome a comprehensive catalogue which revealed all of these 
aspects for each offering.

Might I suggest that, in addition to the compile and link recipe, 
some space be given to unstructured comments for each nos until such 
time as a suitable structure can be designed.

Regards,
-- 
   Tony - G3SKR / W2TG                   email: tgold@panix.com