🚀 go-pugleaf

Peter Fokker <Peter@fokker.demon.nl> wrote:
: In article <862506921snz.8460@grempc.demon.co.uk>
:            news-reply.8460@grempc.demon.co.uk "Graham E Kinns" writes:
[snip]
: > [1] this is still a work-in-progress [...]
: Isn't that always the case? <g> But serious: it seems that there are
: several unique individual versions of KA9Q floating around but sofar
: I haven't found out who the 'official' maintainer is for Demon's
: implementation of KA9Q. That means that there is no 'official' way
: to report/fix bugs and that a lot of effort is wasted on fixing the
: same bugs over and over again. Perhaps I am a little optimimistic here,
: but wouldn't it be nice to have a single source that is actively maintained?

As far as I'm aware, unless things have changed without me noticing or
finding out, Demons KA9Q is maintained by Malcolm. That said I'd
report bugs here as well so that all the individual versions can be
fixed as well.

On the subject of bug fixes the latest version of JNOS has got a
memory checking function in smtpserrv.c to stop ka9q locking up when
processing large mail queue's as soon as I have some spare time I'll
have a look at incorporating it into Demons code, but it looks like it
should be quite a simple modification to make.

--
RobertM
Demon Internet Ltd
            "Trust the computer the computer is your fiend"