Re: Ka9q, how to close socket?

Article View: demon.ip.developers

Article #666

Back to demon.ip.developers Previous Next

#666

From: Paul L. Allen
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00

13 lines
1061 bytes

In article <x7ybdgmvi4.fsf@blodwen.demon.co.uk>
    jrg@demon.net writes:

> the lack of 0.9 support is indeed correct, but in this modern age
> pretty insignificant IMHO.

That's probably because you don't run a browser that can only send 0.9
requests.  I wonder how much transatlantic bandwidth is wasted because
the cache doesn't handle 0.9.  I also note that this is one instance where
Demon don't make a big fuss of sticking strictly to the RFCs...

--Paul

Technical Details

Message-ID: <cdsxa7j030n@sktb.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <852574503snz@wash.demon.co.uk> <x7ybdgmvi4.fsf@blodwen.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10bb05,e7fd7dfc60d2b809
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb05,public
From: "Paul L. Allen" <pla@sktb.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Ka9q, how to close socket?
Date: 1997/01/28
Message-ID: <cdsxa7j030n@sktb.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 212845786
references: <852574503snz@wash.demon.co.uk> <x7ybdgmvi4.fsf@blodwen.demon.co.uk>
x-mail2news-user: pla@sktb.demon.co.uk
x-mail2news-path: relay-11.mail.demon.net!relay-9.mail.demon.net!sktb.demon.co.uk
organization: Chaos
reply-to: pla@sktb.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: demon.ip.developers

Reply to Parent Message