Article View: demon.ip.developers
Article #677Re: SMALLNET.EXE, HTTP command extension; & Killfile question
From: David Woolley
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 00:00
42 lines
2861 bytes
2861 bytes
In article <847905832snz@alquds.demon.co.uk>, Shakib Otaqui <shakib@alquds.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Any ideas on the best way to implement it? Seeing the many > variations in the spam I've received in the past I've used, for > example, "*emailsrus.com*" (without the quotes). If you are talking about the Nokia and 666 spams, these have been nowhere near emailsrus. As the sender is reasonably proficient in forging them, it is likely that any significant filtering on envelope address will simply cause a change to random addresses or to addresses that you can't safely refuse, or which he has a grievance against. The only way of anything like reliably filtering these is to accept the message and then scan the subject and body for keywords inicative of a spam. This is largely a human factors problem. You have to convince the spammer that spamming is unprofitable and you have to convince all the ISPs between him and the virtual backbone that they should not do business with spammers and the people who service them. One backbone ISP, Sprint, currently has a policy that they are not responsible for the actions of their ISP customers, possiby because CyberPromo (the owners of the real emailsrus, have taken legal action against them for their breach of contract in trying to cut them off!) (Actually, I wonder if CyberPromo will take legal action for abuse of their emailsrus trading name!) If you want to do automatic processing, and bouncing, you need to accept the message, construct a chain of trust on the Received lines, reverse resolving any IP addresses, and trying successive higher SOA and/or looking for the last "good" address on a traceroute, and then bounce them to the ISP associated with that address. This can only really be reliably done manually. -- David Woolley, London, England david@djwhome.demon.co.uk (Sending any email to this site constitutes a licence to copy it to any company which might reasonably be assumed to have transported it or might reasonably be assumed to service any addresses quoted in it. 15Sep1996)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<E10GMH.L3n@djwhome.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<846692592snz@bobsh.demon.co.uk> <847543433snz@wash.demon.co.uk> <847905832snz@alquds.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10bb05,2dcae2933831a457 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb05,public X-Google-Thread: fb525,2dcae2933831a457 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb525,public From: david@djwhome.demon.co.uk (David Woolley) Subject: Re: SMALLNET.EXE, HTTP command extension; & Killfile question Date: 1996/11/17 Message-ID: <E10GMH.L3n@djwhome.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 197185229 sender: news@djwhome.demon.co.uk (news) references: <846692592snz@bobsh.demon.co.uk> <847543433snz@wash.demon.co.uk> <847905832snz@alquds.demon.co.uk> x-mail2news-user: news@djwhome.demon.co.uk x-mail2news-path: djwhome.demon.co.uk organization: Demon Subscriber at Home newsgroups: demon.ip.developers,demon.ip.support.pc