Re: SMALLNET.EXE?

Article View: demon.ip.developers

Article #765

Back to demon.ip.developers Previous Next

#765

From: John Washington
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00

22 lines
1128 bytes

On Monday, in article <842283433snz@bobsh.demon.co.uk>
     Bob@bobsh.demon.co.uk "Robert. S. Harris." wrote:

RH> Sorry about this fellahs,  The welcome text said it was KA9Q 2.16D
RH> with http
RH> but it said "unknown command" when I tried to use the http.

Sorry Bob.  Egg on my face time.

Corrected smallnet already uploaded.  No doubt it will be
replaced when Malcolm processes the next batch of uploads
(currently twice a week, he said).

RH> Note:  The supported NET.EXE was 414,730 SMALLNET.EXE was 402,782.
RH>            SMALLNET.EXE smaller?

Hmmm.  Even the corrected (I hope) one is only 406K.  I have
no explanation.  Anybody?

--
John Washington

Technical Details

Message-ID: <842470158snz@wash.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <842283433snz@bobsh.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10bb05,796280e3a30daa1d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb05,public
From: john@wash.demon.co.uk (John Washington)
Subject: Re: SMALLNET.EXE?
Date: 1996/09/11
Message-ID: <842470158snz@wash.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 180037191
x-mail2news-path: wash.demon.co.uk
x-nntp-posting-user: john@wash.demon.co.uk
references: <842283433snz@bobsh.demon.co.uk>
newsgroups: demon.ip.developers

Reply to Parent Message