🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <26512@wash.demon.co.uk>
           john@wash.demon.co.uk "John Washington" wrote:

>Strictly, I suppose one should also consider off site
>links in this definition.  If //wash/A links to //keris/B,
>which in turn links to //wash/C, even though there are
>no links (direct or indirect) from A to C within //wash,
>are A and C part of the same site, as far as depth of
>search?

And is //keris/B part of that 'site'?

Note that you have to catch recursion as well - it's not at all uncommon
for Web pages to have circular references (in fact some pride themselves
on it)...

>Frankly I don't really care, I think whatever way the code
>happens to fall out, that's the way it's supposed to
>work!

I like that!  It's the way I think as well <g>...

>Ooops, yes, I don't know why I imagined I could
>have links from non-html files!  Thanks.

Well, I don't *think* you can.  Yet...

.-------------------------------.-------------------------------------.
|    chris@keris.demon.co.uk    |  FIAWOL (Filking Is A Way Of Life)  |
`-------------------------------^-------------------------------------'