🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Snews.960607.222328.chris.6028@keris.demon.co.uk>
           chris@keris.demon.co.uk "Chris Croughton" writes:

> In article <31b8034a.628204@news.demon.co.uk>
>            robm@demon.net "Robert Mortimer" wrote:
> 
> >I know it took me a while to find it, and then a bit longer to check
> >that it was correct etc. However it is in section 3, titled
> >registration of shareware, in the readme.1st dated 03/10/95
> >which was in the 2.16d release.
> 
> Release of what, though?  All I have is net216d.zip, which *only*
> contains net.exe.  No readme files, nothing else.  And the source
> archive, ka9q216d.zip which doesn't include it either.
> 
> As I said, I don't d/l the front-end stuff because I don't use it, my
> system is customised the way I like it.

Sorry to butt in again, but I fear it might be me that started
the confusion:(  The '216d' release I was referring to was the
DIS216d.EXE sfx - this is where I found the readme.1st.

I suppose Demon assume that anyone d/loading NET upgrades will
already have all the docs etc. from a previous full package.

A case for including the salient docs in the NETxxx.ZIPs, maybe?
-- 
Pete