Article View: demon.ip.support.nt
Article #218Re: MSexhange5.5 & Proxy 2.0!!
From: mak
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00
45 lines
2889 bytes
2889 bytes
I know a guy how deploys SBS all the time and with Demon accounts, the other day he was telling me that he found a site with out packet filtering turn on so enabled it, incoming mail stopped....This is what he did, selected these ports to open from the built in list ( do not spec your own) SMTP, POP3, HTTP & HTTPS and set open both ways. This will allow exchange to listen on port 25 which Demon will deliver to. "Miles Gaynor" <mg@castlehoward.co.uk> wrote in message news:E604B4DA88E0D311B6A2009027E0197E0BD2E3@SBSSERVER... > I use sbs 4.5 as well, in fact it may have been my post that you were > referring to. > Still, I can't get this to work. I am rapidly starting to think that > Demon do something > weird with regards to working out who is connected. Once I have IP > filtering in place, > and have set up what /should/ be the correct filters, only a mailkick > from a demon tech > will start the mails flowing. I have tried setting a filter for identd > with remote host > set to any, I have set open stmp ports for all the demon mail servers I > could find IP > addresses for (at least 15!). I even set a filter opening SMTP for both > directions and > any remote host IP but still no joy - unless Demon did a mailkick and > then the email > would come in. The weird thing was that I didn't have to drop and > reconnect. The > filters worked fine and let in what they were supposed to. It seems that > Demon just don't > send the mail. The Echange server is all ready to take the traffic, but > Demon just don't > send! Now, since Demon don't support ETRN or TURN, how can we let them > know that we want > our mail? I assumed that the act of logging in would do it (as I guess > Demon did too) but > what have we missed? > > Maybe we could collaborate via email once the group gets bored of us > SBSsers dissing Demon! > Sory to wibble, it's too late to be at work!! > Miles > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0XJF5.1007$fk2.109561@news1.cableinet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<969890818.353.0.nnrp-10.c2de8b30@news.demon.co.uk> <969894755.1892.0.nnrp-10.d4f0f5e4@news.demon.co.uk> <970041039.17136.0.nnrp-10.c2de8b30@news.demon.co.uk> <9le8ts4jdjfdpd46iia2t7i5ns1o5atqht@4ax.com> <E604B4DA88E0D311B6A2009027E0197E0BD2E3@SBSSERVER>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d46,594528b4f8361b73 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d46,public From: "mak" <mek@kramweb.com> Subject: Re: MSexhange5.5 & Proxy 2.0!! Date: 2000/10/13 Message-ID: <0XJF5.1007$fk2.109561@news1.cableinet.net> X-Deja-AN: 681127824 References: <969890818.353.0.nnrp-10.c2de8b30@news.demon.co.uk> <969894755.1892.0.nnrp-10.d4f0f5e4@news.demon.co.uk> <970041039.17136.0.nnrp-10.c2de8b30@news.demon.co.uk> <9le8ts4jdjfdpd46iia2t7i5ns1o5atqht@4ax.com> <E604B4DA88E0D311B6A2009027E0197E0BD2E3@SBSSERVER> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueyonder.co.uk X-Trace: news1.cableinet.net 971467580 62.6.109.148 (Fri, 13 Oct 2000 21:06:20 BST) Organization: Cable Internet (post doesn't reflect views of Cable Internet) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 21:06:20 BST Newsgroups: demon.ip.support.nt