🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.ip.support.nt
Article #39

Re: Point to point tunnelling

#39
From: Peter R Cook
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 21:21
54 lines
3236 bytes
In article <983390869.5750.0.nnrp-08.9e98a0a9@news.demon.co.uk>, Sean
Bolton <sean@NOSPAMcompsupp.demon.co.uk> writes
>Hi,
>
>I have been asked to implement a system for a local charity.
>
>They currently have NT Backoffice server running their Head Office network,
>mainly serving documents to Microsoft Word & Excel, mail & calendars through
>Exchange and sharing their Internet connection through Proxy server.
>
>They need to allow access to this network to five satellite offices, mainly
>for sharing documents and email & calendars.
>
>I intend to propose that each satellite office has its own Demon Premier
>Connect Plus account on ISDN. The server would have ADSL and each satellite
>office would connect to the server using point-to-point tunnelling.
>
>Does anyone have any experience of this kind of network?
>
>Any comments would be appreciated.
>
>--
>Sean R. Bolton
>sean@NOSPAMcompsupp.demon.co.uk
>
>Remove NOSPAM to reply.
>
Sean,

I have not implemented a network specifically that way, but I have had
recent experience of users on desktops at home using a VPN client to
tunnel from standard Demon Dial up 56k accounts to the firewall on a
512K permanent connection.

With one user on a 56k link to Demon it worked reasonably well, provided
that the users (both central and remote) were clearly aware of the
bandwidth limitations of the environment. This meant not sending multi-
Megabyte documents and Powerpoint presentations as E-mail attachments,
but placing them on the server and e-mailing pointers. It also meant
using text E-mail rather than writing Word memos (with scanned corporate
logos embedded in them) and e-mailing them. Be particularly careful what
you ask Exchange to do on line. It assumes in this environment that it
is on a LAN, and that bandwidth is free. It works best in this
environment if it is set up to operate  "off-line" and the users use
"send -receive" to get & send mail, and synchronise calendars.

If multiple users in each remote office expect to be able to go "on-
line" to the exchange server, and then drag and drop multi-megabyte e-
mails between exchange folders the performance, and user satisfaction,
will be abysmal.

Regards
-- 
Peter R Cook
Technical Details
Message-ID: <zkyIapA3vWn6EwtW@wisty.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-xfer.nuri.net!newsxfer.interpacket.net!isdnet!grolier!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!wisty.demon.co.uk!PCook
References: <983390869.5750.0.nnrp-08.9e98a0a9@news.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 112d46,f5b0c710aac3e54a
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d46,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-01 01:58:03 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-xfer.nuri.net!newsxfer.interpacket.net!isdnet!grolier!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!wisty.demon.co.uk!PCook
From: Peter R Cook <PCook@wisty.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: demon.ip.support.nt
Subject: Re: Point to point tunnelling
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 21:21:59 +0000
Organization: Personal
Message-ID: <zkyIapA3vWn6EwtW@wisty.demon.co.uk>
References: <983390869.5750.0.nnrp-08.9e98a0a9@news.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wisty.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: wisty.demon.co.uk:158.152.39.99
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 983440452 nnrp-13:19981 NO-IDENT wisty.demon.co.uk:158.152.39.99
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.00 S <Xq7fpszRn1uz8nzuxBjDmEMxf+>
Lines: 54