🚀 go-pugleaf

In <897796556snz129.os2.7@sunshine.tm>, {R}@sunshine.tm (Richard Ashton) writes:
>In article <897781428.1686.0.nnrp-11.9e980436@news.demon.co.uk>
>           Danny@midlife.demon.co.uk  writes:
>
>} domain demon.co.uk
>} nameserver 158.152.1.193
>} nameserver 158.152.1.65
>
>These are WRONG and will only resolve demon hosts
>
>You should use
>
>158.152.1.58 or
>158.152.1.43
>
>Demon withdrew the others a week ago after giveing many many notices
>on the demon.announce mailing list and news group, over the past year.
>
>{R}
>
OOPS! - I don't know whether it makes a difference, but I have two RESOLV files
in \tcpip\etc - one is as above with the correct nameservers, the other is RESOLV2
with my posted values  (actually I have another two in \mptn\etc, both with the
correct values.)  Which resolve file does OS/2 use - resolv or resolv2?

I thought I had updated the file when the announcement was made, but I only updated
the resolv file.  Surely I wouldn't get a working connection at 33k either if the DNS
entries were wrong?

As said in my previous not everything is fine at 33k, but not at 56k

Regards,
Danny