Article View: demon.ip.support.other
Article #896Re: Problems setting up RAS
From: Richard Smith
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 00:00
49 lines
2789 bytes
2789 bytes
Peter Scales <peter@sleepy.demon.co.uk> wrote: >In article <x1rkOsAvtxmxEw4S@wookie.demon.co.uk>, John Beardmore ><wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk> writes >>>Probably not :-) DHCP is 'Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol' and as >>>Demon give a fixed IP address, this is likely to do you no good. You >>>should have selected 'Server assigned IP address' and given your Demon >>>IP number there. >> >>If you put your demon address here and it gets assigned to your ether >>net card, won't that be in conflict with the need to assign the demon IP >>address when setting up the RAS network settings ? >> >God knows :-) This area seems to be a whole can of worms for many >people. I run a standalone box so don't have a NIC in my configuration. >A colleague runs both a NIC and RAS - seems to work for him. Others >have said 'disable the TCP/IP binding to the NIC before trying RAS'. >Maybe you need to enable IP routing to run both? One day I'll read the >Resource Kit Networking guide cover to cover and set up a NIC in my box >and play, then maybe I'll know what I'm talking about :-) but probably >not. I run two NT boxes, one has an NIC the other doesn't and they both use RAS to access Demon. The box without an NIC has no IP address in the TCP/IP config menu, only the DNS server settings are filled in as per the FAQ. I don't remember how I managed it, but it must have been fairly straight forward. The whole page is greyed out, as there is no NIC listed in the pull down at the top of the page. In fact, my Demon IP address is not present anywhere on the system and is negotiated at connect time, via PPP. The box with an NIC has the LAN IP address in this menu, the DNS menu has the same Demon NSs listed as the other box, the LMHOSTS file has a few local names on the LAN subnet. Contrary to the FAQ I did NOT disable any of the TCP/IP bindings to the NIC. And to my amazement, both the LAN and RAS coexist, even simultaneously, with different IP addresses. The listeners listen to both nets, and you can ping hosts on either by name. I don't have IP routeing enabled, so both nets are effectively isolated from each other. I guess I'm just another NT convert, Richard.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<832361914.2054.0@jezebel.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6qx9aCAhQ6lxEwwI@soliton.demon.co.uk> <pAsuOCAUSLmxEw4A@sleepy.demon.co.uk> <x1rkOsAvtxmxEw4S@wookie.demon.co.uk> <DzFUSMA37InxEwnv@sleepy.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f8ef,65956a12b6c77b83 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f8ef,public From: richard@jezebel.demon.co.uk (Richard Smith) Subject: Re: Problems setting up RAS Date: 1996/05/17 Message-ID: <832361914.2054.0@jezebel.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 155538985 x-nntp-posting-host: jezebel.demon.co.uk references: <6qx9aCAhQ6lxEwwI@soliton.demon.co.uk> <pAsuOCAUSLmxEw4A@sleepy.demon.co.uk> <x1rkOsAvtxmxEw4S@wookie.demon.co.uk> <DzFUSMA37InxEwnv@sleepy.demon.co.uk> newsgroups: demon.ip.support.other