Article View: demon.ip.support.pc
Article #922Re: windows mailer mangling some e-addresses, causing bounces with gremnos (was: punt-3 or mailstore is [ditto])
From: pete
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:27
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:27
93 lines
6168 bytes
6168 bytes
In article <20070714.1954.70706125snz$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk>
v$af$ppint@i-m-t.demon.co.uk "ppint. at IMT" writes:
> - hi; in dipspc article, <20070713.1551.7055snz@flashy.nut>,
> sum1@flashy.nut "Ian" volunteered:
> > pete@nospam.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >> [i, too, contributed:]
> >>>
> >>> - an interesting principle, the - or at least an - exact
> >>> inverse of the principle used to make first evaluations
> >>> of the designs of such aeroplanes, as the vickers-super-
> >>> marine spitfire and the de haviland mosquito: that their
> >>> lines were so beautiful, they *had* to be right...
> >>
> >And the late lamented Concorde, don't you think?
>
> - indeed; there seemed to this ppint. to be quite a bit
> of the form of barnes wallis' proposed supersonic air-
> liner for (iirc) vickers in the lines of the concord[e].
Really? Like Ian I had no idea that Barnes Wallis was ever
involved/interested in supersonic flight..
> >>Indeed so and I'm sure few would disagree. I would even include
> >>the DH Comet (the air racer, not the airliner) in that list.
>
> - the pointy-nosed D.H.88 had, aside of the engine nacelles
> and undercarriage (when down), lines that flowed beautifully
> smoothly - but i don't actually remember now reading what
> she was like to fly. is there any account of her handling
> in a uk-published book, that you could recommend?
Im sure there must be; best bet to try would probably be the
Shuttleworth Collection bookshop. However I did find this
(apparently US) page on the www:
<http://www.flightsim.com/cgi/kds?$=main/feature/comet/comet.htm>
[hope I type that properly]. ISTR from the distant past that the
DH88 was a handful at low speed, prone to tip stalling and
generally very unforgiving. But hey, it was designed to win
races -- and not have its beautiful aerodynamics spoilt by
"safety features" like washout or being stable ;-)
> >>But at the other end of the beauty stakes we have helicopters (or
[..]
> - hmmmm... i don't believe *any* helicopter has been said
> to "fly beautifully". and, given the way the helicopter
> design plummets out of the sky when rotor power is lost
> (pure helicopter design, that is), i think it fits the
Actually I believe that a helicopter will "glide" under pure
autorotation if power is lost. The only drawback is that one
needs lots of height and or speed to enter this state. Though
perhaps with a glide ratio of maybe 3 or 4 to 1, plummet is a
rather more apt description!
> unencumbered "beautiful lines - beautiful flyer" rule,
> rather than contradicts it.
> [the cierva autogyro, and the sixties/seventies barnes
> autogiro are an entirely different kettle of flying fish.]
> >>
> >>>>but maybe if we keep this thread going long enough...
> >>>
> >>> - extending the length of this thread in tempora, i can
> >>> cope with; in quality (or width), however...
> >>
> >>Well, we were up to 570 chars or so before this reply so it's
> >>getting closer -- quality or not. And with some judiciously
> >>enhanced message-IDs (see this one) we could get there quicker.
> >>
> >Always willing to help out. Unlessit involves parting with money,
> >of course....
Thanks for the help. However I have to confess that I've been
messing around in demon.test and can now proudly confirm that the
new code works as expected. Sadly however, in the course of this
testing I found an unrelated "feature" with long message-IDs and
variously sized fixed-length buffers :-( so spent a lot of
yesterday removing all those and replacing them with dynamically
allocated ones. Still a small display problem, but the articles
themselves seem uncorrupted; more work to do there...
[..]
> - the happy^W contented satisfaction of a puddleglum?
?? I see Ian has asked too.
Cheers,
Pete
--
"We have not inherited the earth from our ancestors,
we have borrowed it from our descendants."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1184563621snz@nospam.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsinpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!nospam.demon.co.uk!not-for-mailReferences:
<30905060@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <70206062protext$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <1172392077snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <1172427583snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <70206169protext$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <70206196protext$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <20070226.2016.804998snz@twoplaces.co.uk> <70206201protext$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <1172647446snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070228.1208.806281snz@twoplaces.co.uk> <1172691633snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070301.0911.807028snz@twoplaces.co.uk> <1173163692snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070706.1526.70706045snz$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <1183751565snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070711.1914.70706097snz$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <1184304292snz_extemded_to_consume_space@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070713.1551.7055snz@flashy.nut> <20070714.1954.70706125snz$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb525,3b70e3447b6a3e36 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb525,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsinpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!nospam.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: pete@nospam.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: demon.ip.support.pc Subject: Re: windows mailer mangling some e-addresses, causing bounces with gremnos (was: punt-3 or mailstore is [ditto]) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PDL Lines: 93 Message-ID: <1184563621snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> References: <30905060@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <70206062protext$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <1172392077snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <1172427583snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <70206169protext$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <70206196protext$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <20070226.2016.804998snz@twoplaces.co.uk> <70206201protext$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <1172647446snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070228.1208.806281snz@twoplaces.co.uk> <1172691633snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070301.0911.807028snz@twoplaces.co.uk> <1173163692snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070706.1526.70706045snz$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <1183751565snz@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070711.1914.70706097snz$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> <1184304292snz_extemded_to_consume_space@nospam.demon.co.uk> <20070713.1551.7055snz@flashy.nut> <20070714.1954.70706125snz$@i-m-t.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: pdlhost.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1184564912 25638 212.228.66.87 (16 Jul 2007 05:48:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:48:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Reply-To: pete at the nntp-posting-host X-Newsreader: Snews v1.32.00 (GeK/PJD)