🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4b03pj$jfd@wizvax.wizvax.net>
           keegan@wizvax.wizvax.net "james g. keegan jr." writes:

> Iolo Davidson  <io1o@mist.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> : In article <4ar2cs$nus@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> npeal1@prairienet.org "N Peal"
> :         "N Peal" writes:
> : > 
> : > I understand how humiliating this must be for you, Mr. "You can't
> : > provide any evidence that "imo" is an accepted net.convention" Firth.
> : 
> : But you haven't provided any evidence to support your point.  
> 
> don't you think you should deal with your old lies
> before you post new ones as you did here.

Peal has supplied no evidence.  Her examples of possible 
mis-usage are not evidence of accepted usage, as has been pointed 
out to her.

> : Your example of other posters calling people "Imo", in your words 
> : "as keegan did", only support me and the others who accept that 
> : he called me "Imo"..
> 
> how humiliated you  must have felt when you typed that one.

Peal is the one who claims these examples were people using the 
word as you did, so she is the one who maintained that they were 
calling people "Imo".  I suppose it is possible.  Wijnand says it 
is a common Japanese name.

I have removed demon.local from the followups.  Keegan will be 
forced by his own obsessiveness to add it back to the newsgroups 
line.  I won't see his response unless he does.

-- 
HALF A POUND                SPREAD ON THIN
            FOR                           ABOVE THE COLLAR
               HALF A DOLLAR                              Burma-Shave