🚀 go-pugleaf

Mike Fleming (Mike@tauzero.demon.co.uk) wrote:
: In article <49qhnm$mso@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
:            kkelly1@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu "Kevin Kelly" writes:

Since I removed talk.abortion from the follow-ups of the post you are
replying to and you added it back in, I am gratified to know that you
would never have complained about posting inappropriately to newsgroups by
any individual. Or have you? Nah that would make you a hypocrite. 

: > Sadly I understand all too well. It's quite a condemnation of the school 
: > system and society in general that we allow what happened to Iolo to 
: > occur. I am sure it's not his fault that he's as a dense as a board. 

: Ah, the standard line brought out by the keegan worshipper, that 
: anyone who doesn't agree with keegan must be stupid. 

Oooh I do love the irony of your statement given the drivel you have 
posted about people not agreeing with you. Oh well. And I note further 
delusions from you concerning text that you appear to see yet to normal 
people does not appear anywhere. Have you sought help yet or perhaps you 
are too embarassed?

: Unfortunately for you, those of us with intelligence

Speaking for others who don't share your characteristics may be 
considered rude. Including yourself with the those who posess 
intelligence is even ruder.

[...]

: > However  your defense of that stupidity can only be laid 
: > squarely on your own sholders.
:                        ^^^^^^^^ shoulders. If you're accusing 
:                                 people of stupidity, getting the 
:                                 spelling right seems a pretty 
:                                 essential thing to do.


Ooooo a spelling flame. Such wit, such bravado, resorting to spelling 
flames. What next? Are you going to tell me to go fuck myself or are you 
saving that for an even more special time when even your spelling flames 
don't quite demonstrate how pathetic you have become in your apparent 
need to strike back?

: No, you're defending stupid, sorry, stupidity. 

: And if you think I am defending Iolo, you are very much 
: mistaken. Iolo has no need of my acting in his defence, he can 
: defend himself quite adequately.

Oh he's doing something adequately alright but not quite what he had in 
mind I would imagine. I haven't laughed so hard at the stubborness 
displayed in the defense of stupidity as I have with Iolo. He's 
entertaining to say the least.

: > But don't despair, I am sure that one day you will outgrow
: > the stage you are going through.

: Hmmm. Do they let you have sharp objects in there?

Did you think that one up all by yourself or did someone give you a list 
and suggest you enter the comments from the list at random, despite 
whether they are responsive to the preceeding text or not?

: > Ahhh the arrogance of youth. If your opponents disagree they obviously 
: > don't understand. But feel free to continue in a defense of Iolo's 
: > stupidity that imo means anything other than in my opinion. It may kill 
: > the last few of your brain cells but think of the glory you will gain in 
: > parading that trimuph in front of your playmates.

: Ah, no, if my opponents don't understand then they don't 
: understand. And you plainly don't understand.

You can do better than this, can't you? If you can't there is no shame in 
asking for help from your freinds. Freinds would never let freinds 
embarrass themselves as you are doing now if they could possibly help. 
Prehaps your pride is preventing you from accepting their help?

: For those who do understand, no explanation is necessary.
: For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Had Chinese take-out last night I see.

: > : This appears to be a rampant problem for keegan-lovers. I 
: > : apologise for confusing you with something that betrayed signs 
: > : of intelligence. Don't worry, it won't happen again.
: > 
: > If you had stated I had intelligence  in light of your defense of 
: > stupidity I would have taken that as an insult.

: I'm sorry, I refuse to lie simply to insult you.

Very good. We will see how long that lasts however.

: > : No, it was that you didn't understand. This is a standard 
: > : manifestation of keegan, and he appears to believe that 
: > : repeating crap endlessly makes it true. You appear to believe 
: > : this too, hence my assumption.
: > 
: > SInce I don't remember repeating myself endlessly nor stating that I 
: > beleive endless repetion makes something the truth I can only assume that 
: > the above is the result of your delusions. Is there prehaps some 
: > medication you are not taking that is causing this?

: So you admit that keegan does these things?

Ahhhh reading comprehension was never your strong suit was it? I was 
speaking on those things you claimed on my behalf to beleive. Nothing 
more nor less should be construed from those comments. 

: Good, that's a 
: start. And you believe (not beleive, by the way, another 
: spelling mistake there)

Ooooh another spelling flame. Has anyone explained to you that spelling 
flames are the avenue of those who can't argue? Or do they prefer to 
watch you make a buffoon out of yourself?

: that what it says is right? In the light 
: of these two points, would you care to re-read the paragraph of 
: mine that you quoted and see where I say that you actually do 
: such things, rather than believing in keegan when it does?

I'm sorry I guess you truly don't understand what was written. If you 
like I can use small words from now on if you think that would help.

: > : > Did you think that your perception of Keegan somehow mitigates the 
: > : > stupidity of Iolo?
: > 
: > : Ah, I think you've got that the wrong way round...
: > 
: > Nope, but prehaps the point was too subtle for you to undersatnd.

: No, it was simply incorrect. As is your spelling - specifically, 
: of "perhaps" and "understand" above.

Oooooh more spelling flames. Stop, your merciless. Such wit, such 
intelligence, using spelling flames to rebut your opponents comments when 
many would consider that a sign of how lame you are. You are a 
genius for risking that and venturing ahead where most people with more 
than a brain cell would fear to tread. Bravo.

: I leave it to you to find the one deliberate spelling mistake in 
: my posting...

Nah, spelling flames are the things you see from children.