🚀 go-pugleaf

Peter Hucker wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:05:10 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:03:10 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:02:23 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:02:01 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> APPROVED!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Better use an x64 OS . . . .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vista Business 64bit.  Legal copy for once (I can't be bothered having the
>>>>>>> OS fall apart when the pirate one fucks up).  �100 isn't much compared wih
>>>>>>> �1600.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Always good the be Legal, Peter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Legal has nothing to do with it.  I just want a reliable system.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The 2 home editions don't have useful things like remote desktop.  The
>>>>>>> ultimate one just has gimmicky shit like media centre which I'll never use.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've used Business x64 since January 2006 . . . it's Good (tm).
>>>>>
>>>>> I've got it at work and I like it.  The interface has lots of useful little things - renaming doesn't highlight the extension.  Copying huge numbers of files gives you more options if there are problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> I originally put it on a machine with 1GB of memory.  Hint - don't!  It's acceptable with 3GB.  But my new home machine will have 12, going on 24!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Techno-slut!
>>>
>>> Merci monsieur.
>>
>> Seek help now!
> 
> It is not me that needs help.  It is everyone else.
> 

I reluctantly agree with this statement.
-- 
ah