🚀 go-pugleaf

Holly wrote:
> On Jun 18, 12:44 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Holly wrote:
>> > On Jun 4, 10:29 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Holly wrote:
>> >> > On May 31, 9:37 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Holly wrote:
>> >> >> > On May 30, 8:36 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Holly wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On May 29, 8:17 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Holly wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > On May 28, 9:36 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> Holly wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On May 26, 10:04 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Holly wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On May 26, 4:44 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Holly wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On May 22, 5:36 am, Phil Kyle <philkyle2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Holly <simsala...@mac.hush.com> wrote innews:vLWdndYoIKeIoM3bnZ2dnUVZ_ufinZ2d@comcast.com:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Phil Kyle wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Holly <noon_un...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:1179594870.447060.247740@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 19, 6:02 am, Phil Kyle <philkyle2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> JF <j...@NOSPAMmarage.demon.co.uk> wrote
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> innews:WEsn2tE1XpTGFwJK@marage.demon.co.uk:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> My wife is displeased with ITV.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Maybe because ITV is shit?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Last Monday the 'Ternight with Trev'
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> documentary was all about England's roads and the appalling state
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> they've gotten into. Certainly that's the case in Surrey where
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> stretches of asphalt are used to keep the potholes apart. Several
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> disgruntled users made the point that one needs a 4 by 4
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> off-roader for the suspension to survive.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> So an off roader is better on the road because it has potholes in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> it? You do talk some shite, Jimbo.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> About an hour later there was a programme fronted by Paul Sergeant
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> which was one long whinge about 4 by 4 cars and how they're
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> unsuitable for English roads and are the cause of galactic
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> warming. What annoyed my wife is that the same shot of a row of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> parked 4 by 4s was used over and over again. Trouble is most of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> them in this oft-repeated clip weren't 4 by 4s -- they were Honda
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> CRVs. She bought one last year and, although it has a suspension
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> that owes much to good, old-fashioned marine engineering, it's
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> definitely not a 4 by 4.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Yes, Honda CRV's are two wheel drive pretend 4x4s for hairdressers
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> and other povvos wot can't afford real ones.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> My car, which we sold last year and never got around to replacing,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> was an Ultima Cosworth Scorpio. It was low and sleek. It didn't
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> look big but it was. There's more room in the garage around the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Honda than there was around the Scorpio. At a guess I'd say that
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> the Honda CRV is about a metre shorter. True it's higher than the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Scorpio (thank God -- which makes it a joy for me to get into) but
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> additional height doesn't detract from road space and I doubt if
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> it makes a significant contribution to galactic warming.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Well done for buying one the ugliest cars Ford ever made. Sleek?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> SLEEK? It's a fucking bus.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> My feeling is that people see the chunky nature of 4 by 4s and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> automatically think they're bigger than ordinary saloons. Maybe
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> they ought to take a closer look at those overall dimensions?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> But as you've said the CRV isn't a 4x4, thus contradicting
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> yourself, you silly twunt.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> --
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> P
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> h
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> i
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> l
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> K
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> y
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> l
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> e
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> W
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> o
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> z
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> E
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> r
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> e
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> How can you be so rude to this poor, sick, feeble man?  
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Quite easily, as it happens. I did the same when he was a strapping
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> (i.e. fat) young (i.e. not ancient) man.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Blood oath?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No thanks, I've already eaten.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I thought he
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> was quite witty in the line "Certainly that's the case in Surrey
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> where stretches of asphalt are used to keep the potholes apart."
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Your callousness causes me to wonder ... do you have a hidden agenda
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> here?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No it's blatantly obvious what my agenda is.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <snicker> a sleight of hand.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hmm.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hmm..
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hmm...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hmm....
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hmm.....
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Hmm......
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Hmm.......
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Hmm........
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Hmm.........
>>
>> >> >> >> > Humm..........
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> P
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> h
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> o
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> l
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> S
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> o
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> l
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> e
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> W
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> o
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> z
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> E
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> r
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> e- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Some thoughts that came to mind: "we CAN count; ho-hum, resistance is
>> >> >> >> >> > fuTILE, *approaching the event horizon*, hold that focus ... hum."
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > You know I have ADHD ... right?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Not a sign, evident.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Do you feel inadequate?-
>>
>> >> >> >> > To counting?  Hahahahhaha.  Pinched.  Oppositional.
>> >> >> >> > In a Spelling Bee?  Yes.  I was always in the first ten out.
>>
>> >> >> >> ITYM "Math quiz."
>>
>> >> >> > No <don't be too surprised>, I am sure it was the third grade spelling
>> >> >> > bees that challenged my self esteAm.  Thank Goodness for spellcheck.
>>
>> >> >> Third grade didn't have much of an influence on me.
>>
>> >> >> Fourth, on the other hand . . . .
>>
>> >> > Actually, third grade was okay ... but fourth grade was a bitch.
>> >> > Interesting.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Do you feel rule ridden?
>>
>> >> >> >> Constantly.
>>
>> >> >> >> You?
>>
>> >> >> > Nah.  I'm fairly good at dodging or avoiding.  It seems to come with
>> >> >> > the impulsivity.
>>
>> >> >> Impulsivity?
>>
>> >> >> I did not know you were a neologist!
>>
>> >> > It is in Random House Webster's and in many online dictionaries.
>>
>> >> I'm quite wary of circuitous definitions.
>>
>> > It's in the DSM -IV.
>>
>> Which section!
>>
> 
> Under ADHD silly.

What in the heck are you talking about?

> 
>>
>>
>> >> > Don't you think that the vitality of English is, in part, due to its
>> >> > openness to such growth?
>>
>> >> No; it's the top-down, fsck everything else mentality that lends dominance.
>>
>> >> Or, maybe it's the hip-hip phenomenon.
>>
>> > Ha ... at first I read "Hip-Hop" phenomenon. <still chuckling>  Maybe
>> > "fienomenon."
>> > What's the "hip-hip phenomenon"?  Hurrah?
>>
>> Actually, I meant to write "hip-hop" ;/
>>
>> >  Which rhymes with Sryah and
>> > that makes me think of Cucamonga which is a funny sounding name ...
>> > and a remote reference.
>>
>> IAWTP.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> > Of course, I can understand why "impulseness" is sufficient.  However,
>> >> > the tone of the sentence would be sharper if I had omitted the
>> >> > article.  In this place and time, I like the sound of "It seems to
>> >> > come with impulsivity" over "it seems to come with impulseness."
>>
>> >> I like words ending in "y", also.  Truly!
>>
>> >> btw, ITYM "impulsiveness".
>>
>> > We're on the same wave length. ;)
>>
>> 540 micrometers?
> 
> 450

You seeing red, yet?

> 
>>
>>
>>
>> >> > With further reflection on the construction of this sentence, I think
>> >> > using the "the"  emphasis ... lends weight to the burden that
>> >> > impulsiveness has given to my life.  Well ... now I am torn ... dare I
>>
>> >> See!
>>
>> > What!?
>>
>> I don't remember.
>>
> 
> What?

I forget.

> 
>>
>> >> > move forward?  (talking conventionally)
>>
>> >> Fore-ward, IMO, is the only option.
>>
>> > You have one of those? <said with admiration>
>>
>> Three, but two are kept in their cases.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> > Aren't you the "Ah" who made the very agreeable observation about
>> >> > Canetti's writing, stating "he tends to micro manage"?
>>
>> >> Same "ah", diffferent bluff.-
>>
>> > legerdemain ~
>>
>> Great breed, I agree.  I didn't know you were a dog person.
> 
> What you don't might kill you.

If you don't eat it, someone else will.
-- 
a "aphorism" h