Article View: demon.local
Article #28790Re: GM crops created superweed, say scientists
From: ah
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:08
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:08
216 lines
12744 bytes
12744 bytes
Jim Webster wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 10:53:45 -0400, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Aunt Sally wrote: >>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:01:50 +0200, marcus@myrealbox.com wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> GM crops created superweed, say scientists >>>> >>>> Modified rape crosses with wild plant to create tough pesticide-resistant >>>> strain >>>> >>>> Paul Brown, environment correspondent >>>> Monday July 25, 2005 >>>> The Guardian >>>> >>>> Modified genes from crops in a GM crop trial have transferred into local wild >>>> plants, creating a form of herbicide-resistant "superweed", the Guardian can >>>> reveal. >>>> >>>> The cross-fertilisation between GM oilseed rape, a brassica, and a distantly >>>> related plant, charlock, had been discounted as virtually impossible by >>>> scientists with the environment department. It was found during a follow up to >>>> the government's three-year trials of GM crops which ended two years ago. >>>> >>>> The new form of charlock was growing among many others in a field which had >>>> been used to grow GM rape. When scientists treated it with lethal herbicide it >>>> showed no ill-effects. >>>> >>>> Article continues >>>> Unlike the results of the original trials, which were the subject of >>>> large-scale press briefings from scientists, the discovery of hybrid plants >>>> that could cause a serious problem to farmers has not been announced. >>>> >>>> The scientists also collected seeds from other weeds in the oilseed rape field >>>> and grew them in the laboratory. They found that two - both wild turnips - were >>>> herbicide resistant. >>>> >>>> The five scientists from the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, the government >>>> research station at Winfrith in Dorset, placed their findings on the >>>> department's website last week. >>>> >>>> A reviewer of the paper has appended to its front page: "The frequency of such >>>> an event [the cross-fertilisation of charlock] in the field is likely to be >>>> very low, as highlighted by the fact it has never been detected in numerous >>>> previous assessments." >>>> >>>> However, he adds: "This unusual occurrence merits further study in order to >>>> adequately assess any potential risk of gene transfer." >>>> >>>> Brian Johnson, an ecological geneticist and member of the government's >>>> specialist scientific group which assessed the farm trials, has no doubt of the >>>> significance. "You only need one event in several million. As soon as it has >>>> taken place the new plant has a huge selective advantage. That plant will >>>> multiply rapidly." >>>> >>>> Dr Johnson, who is head of the biotechnology advisory unit and head of the land >>>> management technologies group at English Nature, the government nature >>>> advisers, said: "Unlike the researchers I am not surprised by this. If you >>>> apply herbicide to plants which is lethal, eventually a resistant survivor will >>>> turn up." >>>> >>>> The glufosinate-ammonium herbicide used in this case put "huge selective >>>> pressure likely to cause rapid evolution of resistance". >>>> >>>> To assess the potential of herbicide-resistant weeds as a danger to crops, a >>>> French researcher placed a single triazine-resistant weed, known as fat hen, in >>>> maize fields where atrazine was being used to control weeds. After four years >>>> the plants had multiplied to an average of 103,000 plants, Dr Johnson said. >>>> >>>> What is not clear in the English case is whether the charlock was fertile. >>>> Scientists collected eight seeds from the plant but they failed to germinate >>>> them and concluded the plant was "not viable". >>>> >>>> But Dr Johnson points out that the plant was very large and produced many >>>> flowers. >>>> >>>> He said: "There is every reason to suppose that the GM trait could be in the >>>> plant's pollen and thus be carried to other charlock in the neighbourhood, >>>> spreading the GM genes in that way. This is after all how the >>>> cross-fertilisation between the rape and charlock must have occurred in the >>>> first place." >>>> >>>> Since charlock seeds can remain in the soil for 20 to 30 years before they >>>> germinate, once GM plants have produced seeds it would be almost impossible to >>>> eliminate them. >>>> >>>> Although the government has never conceded that gene transfer was a problem, it >>>> was fear of this that led the French and Greek governments to seek to ban GM >>>> rape. >>>> >>>> Emily Diamond, a Friends of the Earth GM researcher, said: "I was shocked when >>>> I saw this paper. This is what we were reassured could not happen - and yet now >>>> it has happened the finding has been hidden away. This is exactly what the >>>> French and Greeks were afraid of when they opposed the introduction of GM >>>> rape." >>>> >>>> The findings will now have to be assessed by the government's Advisory >>>> Committee on Releases to the Environment (Acre). The question is whether it is >>>> safe to release GM crops into the UK environment when there are wild relatives >>>> that might become superweeds and pose a serious threat to farm productivity. >>>> This has already occurred in Canada. >>>> >>>> The discovery that herbicide-resistant genes have transferred to farm weeds >>> >from GM crops is the second blow to the hopes of bio-tech companies to >>>> introduce their crops into Britain. Following farm scale trials there was >>>> already scientific evidence that herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape and GM sugar >>>> beet were bad for biodiversity because the herbicide used to kill the weeds >>>> around the crops wiped out more wildlife than with conventionally grown crops. >>>> Now this new research, a follow-up on the original trials, shows that a second >>>> undesirable potential result is a race of superweeds. >>>> >>>> The findings mirror the Canadian experience with GM crops, which has seen >>>> farmers and the environment plagued with severe problems. >>>> >>>> Farmers the world over are always troubled by what they call "volunteers" - >>>> crop plants which grow from seeds spilled from the previous harvest, of which >>>> oilseed rape is probably the greatest offender, Anyone familiar with the >>>> British countryside, or even the verges of motorways, will recognise thousands >>>> of oilseed rape plants growing uninvited amid crops of wheat or barley, and in >>>> great swaths by the roadside where the "small greasy ballbearings" of seeds >>>> have spilled from lorries. >>>> >>>> Farmers in Canada soon found that these volunteers were resistant to at least >>>> one herbicide, and became impossible to kill with two or three applications of >>>> different weedkillers after a succession of various GM crops were grown. >>>> >>>> The new plants were dubbed superweeds because they proved resistant to three >>>> herbicides while the crops they were growing among had been genetically >>>> engineered to be resistant to only one. >>>> >>>> To stop their farm crops being overwhelmed with superweeds, farmers had to >>>> resort to using older, much stronger varieties of "dirty" herbicide long since >>>> outlawed as seriously damaging to biodiversity. >>>> >>>> Q&A: What the discovery means for UK farmers >>>> >>>> What's the GM situation in the UK? >>>> >>>> No GM crops are currently grown commercially in the UK. Companies who wish to >>>> introduce them face a series of licensing hurdles in Britain and Europe and >>>> interest has waned in recent years amid public opposition. >>>> >>>> Other firms have dropped applications in the wake of the government field scale >>>> trials that showed growing two GM varieties - oilseed rape and sugar beet - was >>>> bad for biodiversity. >>>> >>>> The EU has approved several GM varieties and the UK government insists that >>>> applications will be considered on a case-by-case basis. >>>> >>>> Where are GM crops grown? >>>> >>>> Extensively in the wide open spaces of the US, Canada and Argentina. In Europe, >>>> Portugal, France and Germany have all dabbled with GM insect-resistant maize. >>>> Spain plants about 100,000 hectares (250,000 acres) of it each year for animal >>>> feed. >>>> >>>> What is a superweed? >>>> >>>> Many GM crop varieties are given genes that allow them to resist a specific >>>> herbicide, which farmers can then apply to kill the weeds while allowing the GM >>>> crop to thrive. >>>> >>>> Environmental campaigners have long feared that if pollen from the GM crop >>>> fertilised a related weed, it could transfer the resistance and create a >>>> superweed. This "gene transfer" is what appears to have happened at the field >>>> scale trial site. It raises the prospect of farmers who grow some GM crops >>>> being forced to use stronger herbicides on their fields to deal with the >>>> upstart weeds. >>>> >>>> Is it a big problem? >>>> >>>> Not yet. Farmers in the UK do not grow GM crops commercially. If they did, then >>>> the scale of possible superweed contamination depends on two things: whether >>>> the hybrid superweed can reproduce (many hybrids are sterile) and, if it could, >>>> how well its offspring could compete with other plants. Herbicide-resistant >>>> weeds could potentially grow very well in agricultural fields where the >>>> relevant herbicide is applied. Most experts say superweeds would be unlikely to >>>> sweep across the UK countryside as, without the herbicide being used to kill >>>> their competitors, their GM status offers no advantage. >>>> >>>> Some GM crops, such as maize, have no wild relatives in the UK, making gene >>>> transfer and the creation of a superweed from them impossible. >>>> >>>> Is it a surprise? >>>> >>>> On one level no, gene flow and hybridisation are as old as plants themselves. >>>> Short of creating sterile male plants, it's simply impossible to stop crops >>>> releasing pollen to fertilise related neighbours. But government scientists had >>>> thought that GM oilseed rape and charlock were too distantly related for it to >>>> occur. >>>> >>>> The dangers of hybridisation where it does happen are well documented - experts >>> >from the Dorset centre behind the latest research published a high-profile >>>> paper in 2003 in the US journal Science showing widespread gene flow from >>>> non-GM oilseed rape to wild flowers. >>>> >>>> Have superweeds surfaced elsewhere? >>>> >>>> Farmers in Canada and Argentina growing GM soya beans have large problems with >>>> herbicide-resistant weeds, though these have arisen through natural selection >>>> and not gene flow through hybridisation. Experiments in Germany have shown >>>> sugar beets genetically modified to resist one herbicide accidentally acquired >>>> the genes to resist another - so called "gene stacking", which has also been >>>> observed in oilseed rape grown in Canada. >>>> >>>> � David Adam >>>> >>>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/gmdebate/Story/0,2763,1535428,00.html >>>> >>> Go organic, go veggie. Safest all round by far. >> Lies! > > True! Only vegetarians can hear plants scream.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<466d1b69$0$15115$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.shared-secrets.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<rokae1pudsf3ldk6i97o5jrh9te9g56dc5@4ax.com> <57nk63lf0vr1a6pnb9toscbo8hu77a4m0i@4ax.com> <466abba8$0$4817$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com> <01gl63loh8ahp19js3khrkfolt7k58sq2o@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1156f6,8399c9776b3fa22f X-Google-Thread: f4f17,8399c9776b3fa22f X-Google-Thread: 10e400,8399c9776b3fa22f X-Google-Thread: 10f0bf,8399c9776b3fa22f X-Google-Thread: 1079ca,8399c9776b3fa22f X-Google-Thread: f9308,8399c9776b3fa22f X-Google-Thread: 10bcf3,8399c9776b3fa22f X-Google-Attributes: gid1156f6,gidf4f17,gid10e400,gid10f0bf,gid1079ca,gidf9308,gid10bcf3,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.shared-secrets.com!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:08:04 -0400 From: ah <splifingate@gmail.com> Organization: happy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: demon.local,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.gardening Subject: Re: GM crops created superweed, say scientists References: <rokae1pudsf3ldk6i97o5jrh9te9g56dc5@4ax.com> <57nk63lf0vr1a6pnb9toscbo8hu77a4m0i@4ax.com> <466abba8$0$4817$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com> <01gl63loh8ahp19js3khrkfolt7k58sq2o@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <01gl63loh8ahp19js3khrkfolt7k58sq2o@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 216 Message-ID: <466d1b69$0$15115$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shared-secrets.com