🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <841045387snz@jk-o.demon.co.uk>, Comp2002@jk-o.demon.co.uk
writes
>In article <841008992snz@bierman.demon.co.uk>
>           tim@bierman.demon.co.uk "Tim Bierman" writes:
>[snip]
>    
>> I notice this is crossposted to misc.kids. Well, how would you like it if
>> the half-baked propagandists at the government got their way, and (say) all
>> alt.sex.* groups were unavailable from UK providers ... then the purveyors
>> of porn started posting it in misc.kids instead? Would you then be happy for
>> this group to be banned, and then the next, and then the next?
>
>  The purpose is not to ban erotic material, but to stamp out pictorial 
>  evidence of the misuse of children, whether leading to their death or
>  degradation.  

The letter from the Met Clubs and Vice Unit contained just about every
group of a sexual nature, and it also stated that this was just the
start. The overt purpose of the letter is to ban all erotic material on
usenet.
-- 
Paul
 "Psychologists doubted this explanation however. They pointed
    out that people's perception of acceleration was not quite
    good enough to account for their ability at shagging flies."