Thread View: demon.service.isdn
18 messages
18 total messages
Started by Charlieb
Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:17
is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Charlieb
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:17
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:17
138 lines
5472 bytes
5472 bytes
Hi
I have found a very easy to follow step by step configuration instructions
for my router (Ascend Pipeline 50) provided by another ISP (American one I
think - EasyStreet/Ascend Pipe 50 ISDN Configuration (NAT) ) from
http://support.easystreet.com/lan/P50-config.html, and wondered if I could
use that but replacing bits with the Demon info rather than trawling through
the incredibly detailed and long and complicated (for someone of my non
existent networking skills!) manuals.
Is this an acceptable way to set up my router?
The problem I seem to come accross is that I'm not sure which IP addresses
to change! The setup is a NAT one and as such uses IP addresses such as
10.0.0.1 where it looks to me as though if i'd followed the manual I would
have put something different!
The info Demon has provided me with is
Your network addresses 194.70.146.16/30 (16-19)
Your networks' Netmask 255.255.255.252
Your routers IP address 194.70.146.17
Demon's router IP address 158.152.1.222
Domain Name servers 158.152.1.58
158.152.1.43
(I currently do not have a domain name)
If I assume all the other settings should work and that it is simply
different IP addresses that make a difference, can anyone tell me if I
should use any of the above information to replace any of the following IP
addresses (which I have snipped from the Easystreet configuration
instructions)?
I am hoping that this will appear quite straight forward to someone who
understands why/when etc one would use IP addresses beginning with 10 or 192
or 198 or 206 etc!
All references to inputing IPs under the various sections in the Easystreet
configuration are as follows:
Configure...
| My Addr=10.0.1.1/24 |
| Rem Name=EasyStreet ISDN |
| Rem Addr=10.0.0.1/24
Ethernet -> Connections -> Demon -> Ip options...
| >LAN Adrs=10.0.0.1/24 |
| WAN Alias=0.0.0.0 |
| IF Adrs=192.168.1.1/24 |
| Preference=60 |
| Metric=1 |
| DownPreference=120 |
| DownMetric=7 |
| Private=No |
| RIP=Off |
| Client Pri DNS=0.0.0.0 |
| Client Sec DNS=0.0.0.0 |
| Client Assign DNS=No |
| Client Gateway=0.0.0.0 |
Ethernet -> NAT -> NAT...
| FR address=10.0.1.1 |
Ethernet -> NAT -> NAT... -> Static Mappings... -> Static Map 01
Note: This static mapping allows access to the router from EasyStreet
| >Loc Adrs=192.168.1.1 |
Ethernet -> NAT -> NAT... -> Static Mappings... -> Static Map 02
Note: If you have a mail server connected to the router's ethernet at
192.168.1.2 ...
| >Loc Adrs=192.168.1.2 |
Ethernet -> Mod Config -> Ether options...
| >IP Adrs=10.0.1.1/24 |
| 2nd Adrs=192.168.1.1/24 |
Ethernet -> Mod Config -> DNS...
| >Domain Name=customer.com |
| Sec Domain Name= |
| Pri DNS=206.26.36.34 |
| Sec DNS=198.107.0.14 |
| Allow As Client DNS=Yes |
| List Attempt=No |
| List Size=N/A |
| Client Pri DNS=0.0.0.0 |
| Client Sec DNS=0.0.0.0 |
| Enable Local DNS Table=No |
| Loc.DNS Tab Auto Update=No |
Having configured the router, further instructions are
...initiate a call to confirm that the router will authenticate with
EasyStreets authentication servers.
Next go to the terminal server screen and try some pings. You may need to
authenticate yourself.
ascend% ping 206.26.36.34
ascend% ping yahoo.com
and finally......
You've now tested connectivity to both EasyStreet and the InterNet and
verified that nameservice is working for your router.
Now you can configure client machines on the 192.168.1.0 network. Be sure to
use 192.168.1.1 as the default gateway and 206.26.36.34 as the primary
nameserver.
After a client is properly configured it should be able to ping the routers
ethernet interface (192.168.1.1) and any InterNet host. Note: You will NOT b
e able to ping the router or any host on it's ethernet from the InterNet.
All suggestions greatly appreciated on what I hope is my final leg to get
this setup working. I perhaps ought to say I am only connecting a single pc
to the router and get the feelong I may be using a sledge hammer to hit a
pin!
Cheers
Charlie
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Iain McWilliams
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 21:06
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 21:06
21 lines
1712 bytes
1712 bytes
"Charlieb" <peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:b6e9rk$i62$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk... > Hi > > I have found a very easy to follow step by step configuration instructions > for my router (Ascend Pipeline 50) provided by another ISP (American one I > think - EasyStreet/Ascend Pipe 50 ISDN Configuration (NAT) ) from > http://support.easystreet.com/lan/P50-config.html, and wondered if I could > use that but replacing bits with the Demon info rather than trawling through > the incredibly detailed and long and complicated (for someone of my non > existent networking skills!) manuals. Have you tried the Configurator program available from the old ascend ftp site? ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Configurator/Pipeline/Current/ Regards, Iain
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Charlieb
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 09:43
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 09:43
73 lines
3235 bytes
3235 bytes
Hi Iain I have tried the Configurator program but when I start the console it says QuickStart could not detect a pipeline. Make sure your Pipeline is powered on and connected to your workstation using the yellow cable and when I try the connect button by manually putting in the IP address it says parsing configuration and then hangs at 100% doing nothing. When I do ipconfig, I get Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : IP Address....................................: 194.70.146.18 Subnet Mask.................................: 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway............................: 194.70.146.17 which all seems ok. I have actually managed to get the router working by putting in the basic Demon info, but still the console does not recognise there is a pipeline attached. So far I am able to connect by using the dial command when I telnet in using the serial port. At least I can now use it and can bin my USB from BT, but while this works, it would be far more preferable if I could get it to work properly and fireup any time I open a web browser etc. Any ideas? Best regards Charlie "Iain McWilliams" <iain@duckend.org.uk> wrote in message news:b6fjd9$4agcg$1@ID-128943.news.dfncis.de... > > "Charlieb" <peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:b6e9rk$i62$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk... > > Hi > > > > I have found a very easy to follow step by step configuration instructions > > for my router (Ascend Pipeline 50) provided by another ISP (American one I > > think - EasyStreet/Ascend Pipe 50 ISDN Configuration (NAT) ) from > > http://support.easystreet.com/lan/P50-config.html, and wondered if I could > > use that but replacing bits with the Demon info rather than trawling > through > > the incredibly detailed and long and complicated (for someone of my non > > existent networking skills!) manuals. > > Have you tried the Configurator program available from the old ascend ftp > site? > > ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Configurator/Pipeline/Current/ > > Regards, > Iain > >
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Iain McWilliams
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 20:53
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 20:53
73 lines
3387 bytes
3387 bytes
"Charlieb" <peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:b6gvt3$83v$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk... > Hi Iain > > I have tried the Configurator program but when I start the console it says > QuickStart could not detect a pipeline. Make sure your Pipeline is powered > on and connected to your workstation using the yellow cable > > and when I try the connect button by manually putting in the IP address it > says > > parsing configuration > > and then hangs at 100% doing nothing. > > When I do ipconfig, I get > > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: > > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : > IP Address....................................: 194.70.146.18 > Subnet Mask.................................: 255.255.255.0 > Default Gateway............................: 194.70.146.17 > > which all seems ok. > > I have actually managed to get the router working by putting in the basic > Demon info, but still the console does not recognise there is a pipeline > attached. > > So far I am able to connect by using the dial command when I telnet in using > the serial port. > > At least I can now use it and can bin my USB from BT, but while this works, > it would be far more preferable if I could get it to work properly and > fireup any time I open a web browser etc. Charlie, I'm fairly much in the dark about this router, but in the absence of someone more knowledgable jumping in I'll give it a go... What do you currently have setup on the Ethernet -> Connections -> Demon -> Ip options... ie: | >LAN Adrs=10.0.0.1/24 | | WAN Alias=0.0.0.0 | | IF Adrs=192.168.1.1/24 | Because it sounds as though the router doesn't know how to get to the outside world, and it's only when you force a dial that demon gives it the correct values. ie: on my router the above values would be (I think) LAN Adrs=192.168.2.1 (I don't use real ip's on my internal network) WAN Alias=0.0.0.0 IF Adrs=212.240.197.233 (My router ip address as supplied by demon) Also it looks like you are not using NAT, ie the ip address of your computer is a valid address which means anyone can attempt to connect to your computer. If you don't have a firewall set up you are leaving yourself open to many flavours of hacks. Regards, Iain
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Brian {Hamilton Kelly}
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 22:18
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 22:18
37 lines
2813 bytes
2813 bytes
In article <b6e9rk$i62$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>
peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com "Charlieb" writes:
> The problem I seem to come accross is that I'm not sure which IP addresses
> to change! The setup is a NAT one and as such uses IP addresses such as
> 10.0.0.1 where it looks to me as though if i'd followed the manual I would
> have put something different!
>
>
> The info Demon has provided me with is
>
> Your network addresses 194.70.146.16/30 (16-19)
> Your networks' Netmask 255.255.255.252
Hmm, you've got more than a single IP address; indeed, you've been given
TWO workable IP addresses ([194.70.146.17] and [194.70.146.18]). So you
*could* connect two hosts without needing NAT. (Although quite how you'd
do that with a router I'm not sure.)
Did you mean to buy a /30 from Demon?
(Incidentally, the other two addresses [194.70.146.16] and
[194.70.146.19] are not free for use, since one is the network number
itself, and the other the broadcast address.)
> All suggestions greatly appreciated on what I hope is my final leg to get
> this setup working. I perhaps ought to say I am only connecting a single pc
> to the router and get the feelong I may be using a sledge hammer to hit a
> pin!
I tend to agree with that viewpoint :-)
--
Brian {Hamilton Kelly} bhk@dsl.co.uk
"We can no longer stand apart from Europe if we would. Yet we are
untrained to mix with our neighbours, or even talk to them".
George Macaulay Trevelyan, 1919
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Charlieb
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 06:17
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 06:17
75 lines
3403 bytes
3403 bytes
Hi Iain Currently I having binned the whole eaststreet cheat attempt, I put the basic demon info like this Configure ------------ EDIT ------------ |Configure... | |>Switch Type=NET 3| | Chan Usage=Switch/Switch | | My Num A= 01454315739 | | My Num B= 01454315739 | | SPID 1= | | SPID 2= | | Ans Voice Call=No | | My Name=ndu-bellord| | My Addr=194.70.146.17/24| (my routers IP address as supplied by Demon) | Rem Name= Demon| | Rem Addr=158.152.1.222/16|(Demons router IP address) | Dial #=0844-0416677 | Route=IP | | Bridge= No | | Send Auth=PAP | | Send PW= ****** | | Recv Auth=PAP | | Recv PW+ ***** | | Save= | which then filled in the IP options automatically with this result Ethernet -> Connections -> Demon -> Ip options... | >LAN Adrs=158.152.1.222/16| (Demons routerIP address) | WAN Alias=0.0.0.0 | | IF Adrs=0.0.0.0/0| > Also it looks like you are not using NAT, ie the ip address of your computer > is a valid address which means anyone can attempt to connect to your > computer. If you don't have a firewall set up you are leaving yourself open > to many flavours of hacks. I think NAT is on, the settings I have are Ether net -> NAT |20-A01 NAT... | | Routing=Yes | |>Profile=Demon | | FR address=0.0.0.0 | | Static Mappings... | | Def Server=0.0.0.0 | | Reuse last addr=Yes | | Reuse addr timeout=0 | It would much appreciated if you can point out any obvious mistakes ! As an aside, since I have set this up, it seems to have interferrred with my Outlook Express which gets stuck while checking a hotmial account and finally says The TCP/IP connection was unexpectedly terminated by the server which I assume muct be directly related. My TCP/IP settings are all set to automatic. Best regards Charlie
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Iain McWilliams
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 08:36
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 08:36
89 lines
4102 bytes
4102 bytes
"Charlieb" <peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b6j82e$da8$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> Hi Iain
>
> Currently I having binned the whole eaststreet cheat attempt, I put the
> basic demon info like this
>
> Configure
> ------------ EDIT ------------
> |Configure... |
> |>Switch Type=NET 3|
> | Chan Usage=Switch/Switch |
> | My Num A= 01454315739 |
> | My Num B= 01454315739 |
> | SPID 1= |
> | SPID 2= |
> | Ans Voice Call=No |
> | My Name=ndu-bellord|
> | My Addr=194.70.146.17/24| (my routers IP address as supplied by Demon)
> | Rem Name= Demon|
> | Rem Addr=158.152.1.222/16|(Demons router IP address)
> | Dial #=0844-0416677
> | Route=IP |
> | Bridge= No |
> | Send Auth=PAP |
> | Send PW= ****** |
> | Recv Auth=PAP |
> | Recv PW+ ***** |
> | Save= |
>
>
>
> which then filled in the IP options automatically with this result
>
> Ethernet -> Connections -> Demon -> Ip options...
>
I think your LAN address is wrong, this should be the ip address of the
router on your LAN.
However as I said before, I think it's important that you use private ip
addresses on your LAN.
Can I suggest that you set your routers ip address to
192.168.1.1/24
via the Ethernet > Mod Config > Ether Options menu.
and hard code your PC to 192.168.1.2 with a mask of 255.255.255.0 and a
gateway of 192.168.1.1
also, if you set your PC to use DNS 158.152.1.58 & 158.152.1.43
this will config the LAN portion of your network.
also turn off the DHCP Spoofing as this attempts to allocate ip addresses to
your computer (we don't want that).
Once this is running you should be able to ping 192.168.1.1 from your
computer and get responses.
(You may also want to try the quick start application again at this point,
make sure that any telnet sessions are closed beforehand though)
Assuming quickstart still doesn't work we will need to configure NAT, this
converts your private LAN address to a public address
20-A01 NAT...
>Routing=Yes
Profile=Demon // This is the connection name, which I
think you have set as "Demon"
Lan=194.70.146.17 // This option is missing on older routers
and single address NAT is the default
FR address=0.0.0.0
Static Mappings...
Def Server=N/A
Reuse last addr=N/A
Reuse addr timeout=N/A
Finally on the Demon Ip options
Ip options... LAN Adrs=192.168.1.1/24 WAN Alias=0.0.0.0 //
This could be set to 158.152.1.222 but it will get allocated automatically
on dial in IF Adrs=194.70.146.17/30 Metric=0 Preference=2 Private=No
RIP=Off Pool=0Hopefully this should work, but this is based on the manual
only so it may require further tweaking :-)Regards,Iain
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Charlieb
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 16:05
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 16:05
122 lines
5307 bytes
5307 bytes
Iain Thankyou so much for taking the time to go through all of that. I have changed those settings and it does now all seem to work correctly ie fire up when i open a browser etc. It still doesn't want to accept there is a pipeline connected when I try to access it from the easy configurator, but I can live with that. I'm not entirely sure getting a router has done anything to help my pings etc so it looks like this is as good as it gets untill broadband is able to reach the further flung corners attached to my exchange. Any idea if I can get an icon into my system tray to confirm I am connected - I've a feeling that is part and parcel of the configurator/monitor, so I may have to do without that aswell and just keep an eye on the blinking lights! Thanks again Charlie "Iain McWilliams" <iain@duckend.org.uk> wrote in message news:b6jg6b$5rjmv$1@ID-128943.news.dfncis.de... > > "Charlieb" <peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:b6j82e$da8$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk... > > > > Hi Iain > > > > Currently I having binned the whole eaststreet cheat attempt, I put the > > basic demon info like this > > > > Configure > > ------------ EDIT ------------ > > |Configure... | > > |>Switch Type=NET 3| > > | Chan Usage=Switch/Switch | > > | My Num A= 01454315739 | > > | My Num B= 01454315739 | > > | SPID 1= | > > | SPID 2= | > > | Ans Voice Call=No | > > | My Name=ndu-bellord| > > | My Addr=194.70.146.17/24| (my routers IP address as supplied by Demon) > > | Rem Name= Demon| > > | Rem Addr=158.152.1.222/16|(Demons router IP address) > > | Dial #=0844-0416677 > > | Route=IP | > > | Bridge= No | > > | Send Auth=PAP | > > | Send PW= ****** | > > | Recv Auth=PAP | > > | Recv PW+ ***** | > > | Save= | > > > > > > > > which then filled in the IP options automatically with this result > > > > Ethernet -> Connections -> Demon -> Ip options... > > > > I think your LAN address is wrong, this should be the ip address of the > router on your LAN. > > However as I said before, I think it's important that you use private ip > addresses on your LAN. > > Can I suggest that you set your routers ip address to > > 192.168.1.1/24 > > via the Ethernet > Mod Config > Ether Options menu. > > and hard code your PC to 192.168.1.2 with a mask of 255.255.255.0 and a > gateway of 192.168.1.1 > > also, if you set your PC to use DNS 158.152.1.58 & 158.152.1.43 > > this will config the LAN portion of your network. > > also turn off the DHCP Spoofing as this attempts to allocate ip addresses to > your computer (we don't want that). > > Once this is running you should be able to ping 192.168.1.1 from your > computer and get responses. > (You may also want to try the quick start application again at this point, > make sure that any telnet sessions are closed beforehand though) > > Assuming quickstart still doesn't work we will need to configure NAT, this > converts your private LAN address to a public address > > 20-A01 NAT... > >Routing=Yes > Profile=Demon // This is the connection name, which I > think you have set as "Demon" > Lan=194.70.146.17 // This option is missing on older routers > and single address NAT is the default > FR address=0.0.0.0 > Static Mappings... > Def Server=N/A > Reuse last addr=N/A > Reuse addr timeout=N/A > > > Finally on the Demon Ip options > > Ip options... LAN Adrs=192.168.1.1/24 WAN Alias=0.0.0.0 // > This could be set to 158.152.1.222 but it will get allocated automatically > on dial in IF Adrs=194.70.146.17/30 Metric=0 Preference=2 Private=No > RIP=Off Pool=0Hopefully this should work, but this is based on the manual > only so it may require further tweaking :-)Regards,Iain > >
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Brian {Hamilton Kelly}
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:26
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:26
30 lines
2544 bytes
2544 bytes
In article <b6j82e$da8$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>
peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com "Charlieb" writes:
> Hi Iain
>
> Currently I having binned the whole eaststreet cheat attempt, I put the
> basic demon info like this
[snip]
> | Send Auth=PAP |
> | Send PW= ****** |
That's fine (not that I know anything about this router); anyway, it
appears to be configuring the router to require it to use PAP when
connecting to Demon, which is what you want.
> | Recv Auth=PAP |
> | Recv PW+ ***** |
However, I would question the wisdom of the above: surely, it now
requires Demon's end to "log in" with your end, using PAP. I doubt very
much that it will try to do this :-) Is there not a "None" option for
"Recv Auth"?
--
Brian {Hamilton Kelly} bhk@dsl.co.uk
"We can no longer stand apart from Europe if we would. Yet we are
untrained to mix with our neighbours, or even talk to them".
George Macaulay Trevelyan, 1919
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Iain McWilliams
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 06:34
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 06:34
36 lines
2548 bytes
2548 bytes
"Charlieb" <peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:b6kah0$1i3$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk... > Iain > > Thankyou so much for taking the time to go through all of that. > > I have changed those settings and it does now all seem to work correctly ie > fire up when i open a browser etc. > > It still doesn't want to accept there is a pipeline connected when I try to > access it from the easy configurator, but I can live with that. It could be down to the age of the router, by the sounds of it you have an early model there. > I'm not entirely sure getting a router has done anything to help my pings > etc so it looks like this is as good as it gets untill broadband is able to > reach the further flung corners attached to my exchange. On ndu here pings to 158.152.1.222 is approx 28ms what are you seeing? > Any idea if I can get an icon into my system tray to confirm I am > connected - I've a feeling that is part and parcel of the > configurator/monitor, so I may have to do without that aswell and just keep > an eye on the blinking lights! I doubt it, as your computer doesn't know anything about the router. It's just on a network that happens to be connected to the internet. Regards, Iain
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Demon
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 10:05
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 10:05
51 lines
3167 bytes
3167 bytes
"Iain McWilliams" <iain@duckend.org.uk> wrote in message news:b6ltee$66bv4$1@ID-128943.news.dfncis.de... > > "Charlieb" <peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:b6kah0$1i3$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk... > > Iain > > > > Thankyou so much for taking the time to go through all of that. > > > > I have changed those settings and it does now all seem to work correctly > ie > > fire up when i open a browser etc. > > > > It still doesn't want to accept there is a pipeline connected when I try > to > > access it from the easy configurator, but I can live with that. > > It could be down to the age of the router, by the sounds of it you have an > early model there. > > > I'm not entirely sure getting a router has done anything to help my pings > > etc so it looks like this is as good as it gets untill broadband is able > to > > reach the further flung corners attached to my exchange. > > On ndu here pings to 158.152.1.222 is approx 28ms what are you seeing? > > > Any idea if I can get an icon into my system tray to confirm I am > > connected - I've a feeling that is part and parcel of the > > configurator/monitor, so I may have to do without that aswell and just > keep > > an eye on the blinking lights! > > I doubt it, as your computer doesn't know anything about the router. It's > just on a network that happens to be connected to the internet. > > Regards, > Iain > > I recently saw a mention of freeware/shareware that would give you the blinking light effect, it tested by pinging a remote address on a regular basis to determine the state of the link. Sadly neither a quick look back, nor a Google threw such a thing up easily, but if there is one out there, there will be several - good hunting! Have fun, Glyn
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Charlieb
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 19:55
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 19:55
13 lines
1656 bytes
1656 bytes
> > | Recv Auth=PAP | > > | Recv PW+ ***** | > > However, I would question the wisdom of the above: surely, it now > requires Demon's end to "log in" with your end, using PAP. I doubt very > much that it will try to do this :-) Is there not a "None" option for > "Recv Auth"? Good point - thanks Brian, I have changed it Charlie
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Brian {Hamilton Kelly}
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:27
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:27
30 lines
2913 bytes
2913 bytes
In article <b6q0n3$hf2$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>
peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com "Charlieb" writes:
>
> > > | Recv Auth=PAP |
> > > | Recv PW+ ***** |
> >
> > However, I would question the wisdom of the above: surely, it now
> > requires Demon's end to "log in" with your end, using PAP. I doubt very
> > much that it will try to do this :-) Is there not a "None" option for
> > "Recv Auth"?
>
>
> Good point - thanks Brian, I have changed it
Somehow or other, that leapt out at me. I became only too familiar with
that particular error, when I configured KA9Q (DOS IP connectivity
software) to use PAP when I switched to ISDN, and made the equivalent
error. I found that, whilst it worked OK with the then Red and Green
(IIRC) ROMPs, it failed with the Purple one (or maybe the other way
round). Whichever, it's obviously wrong to expect Demon to authenticate
themselves with you; one only gets away with it because some of the ROMPs
totally ignore the invitation to send PAP, whereas another (or more)
rejects that configuration option and closes the connection.
--
Brian {Hamilton Kelly} bhk@dsl.co.uk
"We can no longer stand apart from Europe if we would. Yet we are
untrained to mix with our neighbours, or even talk to them".
George Macaulay Trevelyan, 1919
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Charlieb
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:35
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:35
37 lines
3059 bytes
3059 bytes
>It could be down to the age of the router, by the sounds of it you have an early model there. My model seems to be a newer one as it doesn't have a power switch which is meant to be one of of telling and it is also running very new software, but who knows > On ndu here pings to 158.152.1.222 is approx 28ms what are you seeing? Oh for a ping of 28! Here in sunny south glos I am getting pings of 55 on average on ndu, but occasionally it is as bad as 200 :-( I guess thats it untill broadband reaches my farm! This whole connection thing seems to be costing me a lot of money both in terms of work and the running/setup costs. Even though my exchange is enabled for broadband, we are 6 km from the exchange which is apparantly physically impossible, however I hear BT have announced they are to increase availability to 90% which I hope means they have some way of servicing places like here I have also heard the utility companies are going to use the power grid to offer broadband but currently there are only pilot schemes it obscure Hebridean villages! I guess I could always rent office space in Bath or Bristol until such time but that kind of defeats the object of the exercise having escaped London to live in the country. By the way my in reference to other posts about the possibility of there being a BT exchange problem with the service, my local exchange is Yate and I too have dubious connection qualities in the afternoons where it seems to be considerably worse than the mornings. Thanks again for all your help Fingers crossed that the wait for broadband isn't too long! Charlie
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: David Quinton
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:46
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:46
11 lines
1686 bytes
1686 bytes
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 06:27:59 +0000 (UTC), bhk@dsl.co.uk (Brian
{Hamilton Kelly}) wrote:
>when I configured KA9Q (DOS IP connectivity
>software)
Ahh - that brings back fond memories, Brian.
Halcyon days...
--
Discount Chart music: <http://www.ThisBritain.com/Am100music_1.php>
Karma Chameleon Phone: <http://www.ThisBritain.com/karma>
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Iain McWilliams
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 11:37
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 11:37
26 lines
2258 bytes
2258 bytes
"Charlieb" <peopleseemtospammefromgooglegroups@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:b6r66o$h41$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk... > >It could be down to the age of the router, by the sounds of it you have an > early model there. > > My model seems to be a newer one as it doesn't have a power switch which is > meant to be one of of telling and it is also running very new software, but > who knows > > > On ndu here pings to 158.152.1.222 is approx 28ms what are you seeing? > > Oh for a ping of 28! Here in sunny south glos I am getting pings of 55 on > average on ndu, but occasionally it is as bad as 200 :-( I guess thats it > untill broadband reaches my farm! This whole connection thing seems to be > costing me a lot of money both in terms of work and the running/setup costs. It sounds as though you are only using a single channel. I get a much better ping when connected at 128K compared to 64K. Does the pipeline have any leds that indicate how many channels are in use? Iain
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Charlieb
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 12:31
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 12:31
17 lines
1894 bytes
1894 bytes
> It sounds as though you are only using a single channel. I get a much better > ping when connected at 128K compared to 64K. Does the pipeline have any leds > that indicate how many channels are in use? > I've set it up so that it always connects both channels for which it confirms they are both up and quality good In fact I've just changed it to check the ping on one channel and the ping is about the same, the only discernable difference is that it is connected at 64 rather than 128 Charlie
Re: is this an acceptable way to setup my router?
Author: Iain McWilliams
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 17:20
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 17:20
47 lines
2849 bytes
2849 bytes
"Charlieb" <charliebellordat@hotmaildot.com> wrote in message
news:b6rr36$pha$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> > It sounds as though you are only using a single channel. I get a much
> better
> > ping when connected at 128K compared to 64K. Does the pipeline have any
> leds
> > that indicate how many channels are in use?
> >
>
> I've set it up so that it always connects both channels for which it
> confirms they are both up and quality good
>
> In fact I've just changed it to check the ping on one channel and the ping
> is
> about the same, the only discernable difference is that it is connected
> at 64 rather than 128
Ooops my mistake, there must have been some other traffic when I tested 64K
last time because I'm getting the same results now.
128K
Ping statistics for 158.152.1.222:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 29ms
and 64K
Ping statistics for 158.152.1.222:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 26ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 28ms
I wonder if compression could be reducing the ping time? Try setting the
ascend (ppp options) to
Link Comp=ms-stac
VJ Comp=Yes
and configuring the same on
https://www.password.uk.demon.net/webpassword.cgi
Regards,
Iain
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads