🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tuesday, in article <ez2CJCAtayM1EwtO@romana.davros.org>
     clive@demon.net "Clive D.W. Feather" wrote:

CF> In article <892478581snz@siberia.demon.co.uk>, Claire <cl$9804$v@siberia
CF> .demon.co.uk> writes
CF> >Now that it's been rolled out, it had developed an unpleasant
CF> >habit of responding to an RSET with 503, which AFAICS is
CF> >in breach of RFC 821.
CF> 
CF> Could you please post an example transaction ?

Here it is, as posted to the testers list:

both machines in the pepper.mail cluster (i.e. 194.217.242.40 and 
194.217.242.41) are regularly issuing a 503 response to a MAIL FROM: 
command, followed by a 503 response to an RSET.  Here's a sample from 
my logs:

Sun Apr 12 13:52:40 1998 194.217.242.40:25 - smtpcli sent: .
Sun Apr 12 13:52:40 1998 194.217.242.40:25 - smtpcli recv: 421
        Unexpected failure, please try later
Sun Apr 12 13:52:41 1998 194.217.242.40:25 - smtpcli sent: RSET
Sun Apr 12 13:52:41 1998 194.217.242.40:25 - smtpcli recv: 503 
                                  Command out of sequence

HTH

-- 
Anti-spam address in use.  The address given will be valid
for a few weeks; thereafter, change the username to "c-mac"
when replying