Article View: demon.service
Article #53Re: Increase in homepage disk allocation?
From: Tony Morgan
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:27
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:27
56 lines
4235 bytes
4235 bytes
In article <mQHfAKC1eYS8EwdB@xerez.nospam.co.uk>, Shez <news@xerez.demon.co.uk> writes >Actually I think I got my costings a little off - that was the cost for >10 MB. If you're buying decent quality IBM 60GXP disks then 20MB could >cost as much as 4p. Alternatively you could get Maxtor disks at about 3p >for 20MB. If extra speed or reliability is needed, a RAID configuration >will do it. > >As for the cost of extra machines or racks, an alternative is to replace >older smaller disks with large ones, e.g. put a 120GB drive in to >replace an old 20GB one. This pushes up the effective price per MB a bit >but will probably be cheaper than adding more hardware. This is getting OT, but I'm afraid Shez that there are many, many issues other than the actual cost of the disk array that you (and most) are unaware of. To start from the outside in, a single permanent feed into the Internet with an adequate bandwidth for a modest customer base will cost about �2K to setup, with an annual fee of about �5K. And you need to provide fail-over. Then of course you need nameservers. Then to provide a modest degree of security you need to install routers (with sufficient bandwidth) and firewalls (again with sufficient bandwidth). You'll need several routers to maintain subnets within the DNZ. Each of the functional areas (e.g. NNTP, SMTP, POP3) should also have their own firewalls. Then as you get nearer to the disk array itself, you need gigabyte switches to permit multiple accesses to the disk array, with the routers to direct the switching. Most reasonably resilient systems use a system of traffic-controlled switches to provide load-sharing/failover. And with this you need to double-up on the switches and the servers (again to provide a reasonable degree of resilience). Then (apart from the in-house support at various levels) you have to budget for the ongoing third-party support for all the servers. routers, switches etc - which isn't cheap. In conclusion, you might note that few ISPs turn in much of a profit - many (like Freeserve) fail to get into the black. The investment is massive - and the capital investment (aka interest) has to be serviced. If you get charged too much, folk scream, if you get modest diskspace folk scream, and if the service is crappy - folks scream. Funding all these costs is somewhat more that the charge your local PC World puts on its hard drives. Relatively recently, I was involved in putting together a BT Syncordia/Barclays system and the cost was �3.7M - plus of course the running costs - and that wasn't an overly large system. The first Internet account that I had some nine years ago (with Pipex) cost me �300 per year (about �2K at today's equivalent). I think we all do pretty well today. -- Tony Morgan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jhBCdTBeadS8EwOz@atomor.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news-x2.support.nl!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!atomor.demon.co.uk!TonyReferences:
<vlmfutkpdp2930a5uov4nm29tu13br9kcf@4ax.com> <1010589679.23136.0.nnrp-07.c1c3e134@news.demon.co.uk> <mbnu3ukqf8v6bef2ls6qeh9rnh5s2rtih0@4ax.com> <pKz8GTGuXzQ8Ewc4@xerez.nospam.co.uk> <a21ht7$uq3$1@madras.cabal.org.uk> <mQHfAKC1eYS8EwdB@xerez.nospam.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f76f2,c9c6582756d52733 X-Google-Attributes: gidf76f2,public X-Google-Thread: fad9d,31eb62384330f384 X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-19 12:32:11 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news-x2.support.nl!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!atomor.demon.co.uk!Tony From: Tony Morgan <Tony@atomor.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: demon.service,demon.homepages.authoring Subject: Re: Increase in homepage disk allocation? Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:27:10 +0000 Organization: Atomor Web Limited Message-ID: <jhBCdTBeadS8EwOz@atomor.demon.co.uk> References: <vlmfutkpdp2930a5uov4nm29tu13br9kcf@4ax.com> <1010589679.23136.0.nnrp-07.c1c3e134@news.demon.co.uk> <mbnu3ukqf8v6bef2ls6qeh9rnh5s2rtih0@4ax.com> <pKz8GTGuXzQ8Ewc4@xerez.nospam.co.uk> <a21ht7$uq3$1@madras.cabal.org.uk> <mQHfAKC1eYS8EwdB@xerez.nospam.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: atomor.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: atomor.demon.co.uk:194.222.117.76 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1011472280 nnrp-01:17748 NO-IDENT atomor.demon.co.uk:194.222.117.76 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1;format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Turnpike/6.00-U (<CRyoGUYwwmzVGs9UktG7N0bgoV>) Lines: 56