Re: WB3.1 is it worth it?

Article View: demon.tech.amiga

Article #330

#330

From: Neil Bothwick
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 1996 00:00

27 lines
1401 bytes

Hi there Harry, I believe it was you who said:
> CountB (bryce@gothic.u-net.com) wrote:
>: 
>: On Opalvision yes. I just checked and cybergrafix doesn't support it :(
>: 
>: I would seriously advise getting a card that does, as you'll get nearly
>: full AGA support. Only games will still be ECS. DTP will really fly too.

> Thanks James, looks like 3.1/3.2 and a Picasso is the way to go.
> And it's cheaper than a PC!

Didn't someone say that 3.2 is on a 1MB ROM and will only fit
A1200/4000s. I can heartily recommend 3.1 and a Picasso on a 2000
though.

> Anybody want to buy an OpalVision card then?

Are the modules available yet? ;-)


Neil
--

 |           Neil Bothwick, Warrington, England           |
 |--------------------------------------------------------|
    Yeah, but you're taking the universe out of context!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <890.6667T517T1495@wirenet.u-net.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <9604021934.AA00148@s-art.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11015b,3d239ad540ade45c
X-Google-Attributes: gid11015b,public
X-Google-Thread: 1160fd,3d239ad540ade45c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1160fd,public
From: neil@wirenet.u-net.com (Neil Bothwick)
Subject: Re: WB3.1 is it worth it?
Date: 1996/04/03
Message-ID: <890.6667T517T1495@wirenet.u-net.com>
X-Deja-AN: 146040235
references: <9604021934.AA00148@s-art.demon.co.uk>
x-certificate: O-Level Woodwork
organization: The Write Way
newsgroups: demon.tech.amiga,demon.ip.support.amiga

Reply to Parent Message