Re: Problem with System 7.6 CD and 8600

Article View: demon.tech.mac

Article #1938

#1938

From: ric
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00

16 lines
1241 bytes

Rebecca and Rowland <real-address-in-sig@flurbletigibbet.rhubarb.foobar>
wrote:

> Well, I'm
> fiddling around trying to find which OS is most suitable for actually
> *using* a Mac Plus - is 7.0.1 any faster than 7.1?  More efficient?
> Will any software actually *run* under 6.0.8?

I've settled on 6.0.8 for my Plus, which runs an early version of
Think C perfectly, and reboots very quickly when I get something wrong.
To my mind, 7.1 is better than 7.0.1 but they are both too slow to be
fun on a Plus.

-- 
'ric

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1d2uip3.ljirrx1t0u8wiN@rm-dynf1-133.rmplc.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<B0DEAAEF966822C7A@clarityc.demon.co.uk> <1d2ppoo.1358ymn1qrm4qfN@p12.nas2.is3.u-net.net> <B0DFFE8E9668A7B32@0.0.0.0> <B0E03C6F9668201A92@0.0.0.0> <1d2rly2.1kh7eba18fpaioN@p43.nas2.is4.u-net.net> <B0E0E821966836E24@clarityc.demon.co.uk> <B0E12AA1966813107A@0.0.0.0> <1d2trp4.xlq8mou85d1aN@p11.nas2.is3.u-net.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10b5a2,5b9165d8557806c5
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5a2,public
From: btgsch@rmplc.co.uk (ric)
Subject: Re: Problem with System 7.6 CD and 8600
Date: 1998/01/15
Message-ID: <1d2uip3.ljirrx1t0u8wiN@rm-dynf1-133.rmplc.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 316366542
References: <B0DEAAEF966822C7A@clarityc.demon.co.uk> <1d2ppoo.1358ymn1qrm4qfN@p12.nas2.is3.u-net.net> <B0DFFE8E9668A7B32@0.0.0.0> <B0E03C6F9668201A92@0.0.0.0> <1d2rly2.1kh7eba18fpaioN@p43.nas2.is4.u-net.net> <B0E0E821966836E24@clarityc.demon.co.uk> <B0E12AA1966813107A@0.0.0.0> <1d2trp4.xlq8mou85d1aN@p11.nas2.is3.u-net.net>
Organization: Those with six coloured blood
Newsgroups: demon.tech.mac

Reply to Parent Message