Why 4200 cheaper than 4160?

Article View: demon.tech.mac

Article #2277

#2277

From: Jim
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 00:00

6 lines
622 bytes

Does anyone know why Motorola's StarMax 4200 (200Mhz 604e)  is cheaper
than 4160 (160Mhz 604e)? 

-- 
Email: Lyman@cwcas.demon.co.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1997081418012235100@cwcas.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1156c9,dcd4b83c788147b3,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1156c9,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b5a2,dcd4b83c788147b3,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5a2,public
From: Jim@beternet.com (Jim)
Subject: Why 4200 cheaper than 4160?
Date: 1997/08/14
Message-ID: <1997081418012235100@cwcas.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 264205361
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: cwcas.demon.co.uk [194.222.39.166]
Newsgroups: demon.tech.mac,comp.sys.mac.system