Article View: demon.tech.modems
Article #17907USR Sportster & Jim Segrave
From: John McGinlay
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00
61 lines
3472 bytes
3472 bytes
Yeah, Jim, thought that might get your attention!
Some time back I reported that BT had changed my line, and that I
would report back on progress. Well, I can confirm that the line change
*did* work, in that I no longer get dropped connections, but it did
nothing to help my initial connect problems (but more of this later).
So, it seems tha I owe you an apology, and as I have been pretty voluble
in my cricticisms, I will be equally voluable in my apology -
I APLOGISE FOR DOUBTING YOU
Anyway, it transpires that the street outside our house was struck by
lightning some years ago (before we moved in) and my neighbour's son
has since told me that their 'phone lines are always noisy (the neighbour
himself had said there was no problem!). On speaking with some BT engineers,
they confirmed that the symptons I was getting was consistent with a damaged
insulaton that would break down anywhere between 5 and 30 minutes after the
call was initiated, depending upon temperature and moisture conditions
in the underground trunking (which would appear to bear little correlation
to surface weather conditions). Since the new line was installed, I have
had no problems of this type. Why didn't it show on BBS and other ISP calls?
I don't really know, except that maybe they are using modems tht are less
susceptible - I think most of the BBS's use Couriers, and certainly the
Ascends' volume levels seem lower that those on a modem, so the noise was
obviously more of a problem.
OK then, one problem solved, but still 2 to go.
I often received a connect/none response, followed by a whistling tone.
I took {R}'s advice, and addded &M5 into my init string. This 'forces'
an ARQ connection, rather than allowing the far-end modem to determine it.
This worked in about one third cases, but my failures to connect went up
by the remaining two thirds, and I could virtually never get onto an Ascend
finch.
Finally, I saw posting by Ian Clough and Dave English, who advised that
the modems be forced to VFC mode. I did this, and voila! bliss! low BT bills!
For all other USR sportster modem owners out there, the complete string that
works for me at 28800 is
AT&F1&M5S32=24S33=32
This forces ARQ on, forces VFC mode and disables 3329 symbol rate. I for
one am happy to 'crawl' at 28800 rather than go for the dubious pleasure
of reduced bandwidth on the Colt lines at 33600
So, to recap:
Apologies to Jim Segrave
Virtual pints to {R}, Ian Clough and Dave English
Advice to Demon - change the ascends FAQ
if S32=18 does not work consistently, use S32=24 and &M5
--
John McGinlay (reserving the traditional British right to argue from a position
of ignorance, even with an American)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<854453401snz@mcgwin.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102a94,23baef8abdcc8f03,start X-Google-Attributes: gid102a94,public From: John@mcgwin.demon.co.uk (John McGinlay) Subject: USR Sportster & Jim Segrave Date: 1997/01/28 Message-ID: <854453401snz@mcgwin.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 212914009 x-mail2news-path: mcgwin.demon.co.uk x-mail2news-user: John@mcgwin.demon.co.uk organization: the pinnacle of perfection reply-to: John@mcgwin.demon.co.uk newsgroups: demon.tech.modems