Article View: demon.tech.modems
Article #18122Re: Ascend connection problems
From: Jim Segrave
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 00:00
60 lines
4025 bytes
4025 bytes
In article <NW3KqGAro5kyEAx+@loncps.demon.co.uk>, Chris Salter <chris@loncps.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Surely what we should be interested in is the actual output of the > ascend units is, not what the manufacturer says it should be? Have you > measured the output across a sample of individual units? A sample of > USR's should also be measured. We can't measure at the ouput, as it's directly into the E1 from the Telco - it's only analogue for a very short time. > Also if the output level is under software control, could you confirm > that all your ascend units are at the same software level? They were until the 33.6 lines went into beta-test. They are using a later software revision. > I seem to remember that during the implementation of the 100 per cent > coverage back in Nov/Dec of last year that one (or a batch?) Ascend unit > had to be withdrawn because of connection problems and that it was at a > later software level than the others. My own current problem seems > identical to that I experienced at that time. My memory tells me that it > was associated with output levels but I could be wrong. I unfortunately > did not keep Demons newsgroup article explaining what the problem was. We've had to remove a couple of interim releases when testing showed problems, but that simply meant reloading a previous release. There have been several upgrades, normally done on a test Ascend with dialups from Demon, followed by testing on one or two Ascends in one of the hunt groups. The only times I can recall having to drop back to previous releases weren't output evel problems as far as I can recall, but I'm not part of the team which actually does the installation and testing of new Ascend releases. > Are the Ascend units assembled in the UK or are they shipped direct from > the US? dB levels were never my strong point but I think US modems > output at 0 dB whereas the BABT would require them to output at -14 dB. > However, reading the USR Courier manual I note that it has max output at > -13 dB for private wire and -9 dB for PSTN. I assume this may indicate > that my own recollection is associated with private wires (leased > lines). I would interpret the statement that "Later releases of software > provide a way of adjusting the transmit level, but only downwards" as > indicating that the Ascends are probably shipped pre-configured for > maximum output levels within any particular PTT's spec. All this does > raise the possibility of units being shipped out of spec if Ascend QC > isn't quite on the ball. I'm not suggesting that this is the case, just > that it is a possibility. They are assembled in the US. The output level is given as -13 (dbm presumably) and can only be adjusted downwards. I do not know offhand what the BABT or US requirements are, although Ascend has stated that the default setting of -13 is the maximum they are allowed to use in the UK. > Finally, just for my own curiosity, how many incoming (logical) > connections does a single Ascend unit support? 60 connections/Ascend. The previous versions had 6 cards with 8 modems each, the newer ones have 12 modems/card. Two E1s give a maximum of 30 connections/E1 (2 channels are used up for signalling).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199611211713.RAA21699@jes.noc.nl.demon.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32828191.4B53@helion.demon.co.uk> <VUVrVCALjRjyEwbp@tuppambr.demon.co.uk> <199611181957.TAA07529@jes.noc.nl.demon.net> <NW3KqGAro5kyEAx+@loncps.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102a94,4dfa1137aae35630 X-Google-Attributes: gid102a94,public X-Google-Thread: fad9d,4dfa1137aae35630 X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public From: Jim Segrave <jes@demon.net> Subject: Re: Ascend connection problems Date: 1996/11/21 Message-ID: <199611211713.RAA21699@jes.noc.nl.demon.net> X-Deja-AN: 197847092 references: <32828191.4B53@helion.demon.co.uk> <VUVrVCALjRjyEwbp@tuppambr.demon.co.uk> <199611181957.TAA07529@jes.noc.nl.demon.net> <NW3KqGAro5kyEAx+@loncps.demon.co.uk> x-mail2news-user: jes@demon.net x-mail2news-path: jes.noc.nl.demon.net organization: Demon Internet reply-to: jes@demon.net newsgroups: demon.tech.modems,demon.service