Article View: demon.tech.modems
Article #18177Re: 33.6!!!! 28.8 would be nice
From: Frank Payne
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 00:00
62 lines
3265 bytes
3265 bytes
In article <5jcaqDAImMkyEwVj@fpayne.demon.co.uk>, Frank Payne <fpayne@fpayne.demon.co.uk> writes >In article <gEraDBAFXsjyEwNe@sjbcomps.demon.co.uk>, Steve Barnes ><steveb@sjbcomps.demon.co.uk> writes >>In article <ppxQvCA23NjyEwe5@fpayne.demon.co.uk>, Frank Payne >><fpayne@fpayne.demon.co.uk> writes >>>Using a USR Sportster 33.6Vi, I have tried the beta lines and have a >>>100% failure rate of getting a 33.6 connection. >>> >>>I have tried various suggestions quoted in this NG for the string but >>>with no success, so I am no back to using the default with TP 3.02beta. >>> >>>Worse still, over the past few days I have been unable to get a >>>connection better than 26.4 from either the beta lines or the Coventry >>>NER. >>> >>>Before I rewire the computer and give BT a hard time about the line, >>>has anyone else had this recent degradation in service. >>> >>>All replies gratefully recieved. (If this reaches the NG before Monday) >>> >>>Thanks >>I have been using the Beta 33.6k lines since they were announced, with a >>USR 33.6Vi, and I have to say that I get 33.6 connections 95% of the >>time, (31.2/33.6 the rest), no line drops and a redial needed so rarely >>that I could not put a %age on it! This is from Weymouth, I did notice >>that when the local POP, (Blanford Forham), closed and I had to start >>using the national number everything got a lot slower and I had a lot of >>problems untill I got a good init string for the Ass-end connections! >> >>FYI software TP3.01 under win95, >>Init string for 28.8 Number SEND 'AT&F1&D3&K3&N16&U4S54=160\r' >>Init string for 33.6 Number SEND 'AT&F1&D3&K3S54=64\r' >> >>NB I copied and edited the usr28f.mdm to make a usr33f.mdm with the >>latter string in and a different modem name, you can probably guess >>what, and edited the connect.ini file directly to make a different named >>connection for the 33.6 number that uses the 'other' modem, this lets me >>swap between numbers and settings at the same time with minimum fuss. > >Thanks for the advice but, I tried that with the string mentioned above >and all I got was ERROR. I was obviously doing something wrong. So I am >now back to the default setting. > >However, after posting the original letter I was back up to a 28.8 >connection on both the loacal NER and the beta lines. Better than it was >but it would still be nice to see a 33.6 connection > >Please advise further if at all possible. A further update: Succeeded in getting a 31.2 and a 33.6 connection. Login failed at PPP prompt. Both were at Tele 1. Now I seem to have the same problem as everyone else:-) Time for an FAQ perhaps!!!! Frank -- Frank Payne Nuneaton, Warwickshire, UK EMail frank@fpayne.demon.co.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bl3aMLAwdhkyEwj9@fpayne.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<ppxQvCA23NjyEwe5@fpayne.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102a94,f2486a16073d181f X-Google-Attributes: gid102a94,public From: Frank Payne <fpayne@fpayne.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: 33.6!!!! 28.8 would be nice Date: 1996/11/19 Message-ID: <Bl3aMLAwdhkyEwj9@fpayne.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 197494940 distribution: world x-nntp-posting-host: fpayne.demon.co.uk references: <ppxQvCA23NjyEwe5@fpayne.demon.co.uk> organization: Home mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: demon.tech.modems