🚀 go-pugleaf

Chris Lawrence (news@spacetime.demon.co.uk) wrote:
> Re:<slrn64ea1s.1bp.mike@mpellatt.demon.co.uk>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 1997, Mike Pellatt wrote:
> 
> >"They" used the example to show that kit A working with kit B
> >and not with kit C is not sufficient to show that it is kit C that
> >is at fault rather than kit A.
> >
> >"They" certainly did not use this example to state or imply that 3400s
> >have been shown to be out of spec. Yet.
> 
> And what was the point of showing us this if it has no relevance to the
> problem in hand?  Either the example has some relevance to the problem
> which implies this problem with the 3400 or the example has no relevance
> in which case it should be discarded.

A direct question was asked. 'How can it be possible for it to be
the users problem when Demon change something and it no longer
works' (or similar).

The examples that followed were an example of such a possibility.

Conspiracy theories than took over.

-- 
Malcolm S. Muir                                Demon Internet Ltd.
Sunderland                                     322 Regents Park Road
England                                        London N3 2QQ