🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <s7+zmMAuV7Q0Ew$b@peaksys.demon.co.uk>,
Roger Barker <roger@peaksys.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>1.2 Official/Unofficial postings
>>  Among all the other regulars in demon.service there are a large number
>>   of postings from demon.net.  Unless stated otherwise these people are
>>   posting their own views and not DIS policy, but because of their
>>   position within DIS they can often can give an insider's view on what's
>>   happening. The only time postings from anyone at Demon can be taken as
>>   official is if they are either cross-posted to demon.announce or
>>   specifically flagged as being official.
>
>Yes, I was aware that, by the terms of the FAQ, effectively all postings
>in demon.service from Demon personnel are "unofficial". Therefore I'll
>slap my wrists and apologise to Clive. I do think there is sometimes a
>debatable issue in the way "unofficial" postings are used, but I'm not
>going to raise it...

Really? I thought you just did?

Perhaps you'd prefer no comment at all in such circumstances? 
After all, that's the way that most other ISP's handle the 
issue.

Personally, I *prefer* an ISP that allows robust public 
discourse with the staff and directors to those that will
only issue official statements when they've checked out
everything with their lawyers, and where they won't enter
into discussion on the issues.

You may feel differently. If so, may I recommend AOL to
you? Your modem might work there as well.