🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pkkc1BA6qJR0EwyA@codd-date.co.uk>,
Phil Boswell  <Phil.Boswell@codd-date.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <EFHd3cABU1Q0Ew4$@musonix.demon.co.uk>, Paul Terry
><paul@musonix.demon.co.uk> writes
>>In article <876815560.0021398.0@office.demon.net>  wrote:
>>>I don't recall us ever giving advice about purchasing Motorola modems, just
>>>about purchasing standards-conforming modems.
>>"Connecting to Demon Internet was trouble-free using the Motorola"
>>(Dispatches 3, Spring 1996)
>
>I pulled out our copy of Dispatches 3 and quickly skimmed the article in
>question.  AFAICT if the testers said anything at all about connecting
>to Demon, they claimed to have no problems.  For the rest of the modems,
>they say absolutely nothing about whether they could connect or not.
>
>A couple of examples:
>
>Frontier XL28E: "We had no problems at all with the XL288E [sic], and
>connecting to Demon Internet couldn't have been simpler ..."
>
>Frontier Viper 288: "All the default settings worked perfectly for
>connecting to Demon ..."

Well there is my modem, and it is suffering the 0cps fault

Can't remeber what I based my decision on, but since I wasn't a demon user
then so it can have been dispatches.

Ian