🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #22678

Re: port requests

#22678
From: Harry Broomhall
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00
19 lines
1385 bytes
On Wed, 10 May 2000 19:25:27 +0100, Fraser Stewart
<fraser@jlstewart.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Is it true that the ADSL service offered by BT blocks incoming port
>requests?  If so then who do they expect to use it?

   Yes - they are using Network Address Translation AFAIK.

   As to who might want it - most people on the 'net wouldn't know
what NAT was if it hit them, or care.  They just want to surf.  And
NAT doesn't stop that.

   In addition I hear rumours of a 2 hour timeout of an IP address.

   How much of this will be true of the final service I can't say, as
we are still some way from having such a service in the UK.

   Regards,
        Harry.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <e6tjhscr1omh53nmos5e57jisq92s5kl7d@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3919A997.54BD1125@jlstewart.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,2500d61341042d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: Harry Broomhall <haeb@pc60.easynet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: port requests
Date: 2000/05/11
Message-ID: <e6tjhscr1omh53nmos5e57jisq92s5kl7d@4ax.com>
X-Deja-AN: 621847273
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3919A997.54BD1125@jlstewart.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynet.net
X-Trace: quince.news.easynet.net 958013084 73577 212.212.47.26 (11 May 2000 02:44:44 GMT)
Organization: C.I.C. Ltd
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: haeb@pc60.demon.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 May 2000 02:44:44 GMT
Newsgroups: demon.tech.pc