🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <z6peKBAXJ9F5EwAL@ch-w.demon.co.uk>,
	John Chapple <jc@ch-w.demon.co.uk> writes:
> In article <79ffhskh043cmq36l9h5tu7vpbvlvoh7es@news.demon.co.uk>, Denis
> McMahon <denis@pickaxe.demon.co.uk> writes
>>On Tue, 09 May 2000 00:01:02 +0100, Harry Broomhall
>><haeb@pc60.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>1)  Send details of the posts (i.e. headers and suchlike) to 'abuse'
>>>at *your* ISP.  (NTL by some chance?  :-)   )  If they a) can be
>>>bothered, and b) are reasonably competent then the current account the
>>>guy is using will be killed.  He will of course go on to another
>>>account.
>>
>>Most abuse departments have enough on their hands trying to sort out
>>reports about their own customers. The accepted method of reporting
>>abuse is to report it to the ISP of the abuser, not the ISP of the
>>recipient.
> 
> I must say I thought the idea was to send to the *abuser's* ISP (if you
> can) my ISP, (Demon) (for instance) are never interested unless it's one
> of their customers doing the abusing 

  In extreme cases where it is proving difficult to nail the
perpetrator you *may* find the recipient's ISP is willing to help.

  Regards,
     Harry.