🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 01 May 2000 18:33:54 +0100, jon <jon@nospam.com>
wrote:

>On Mon, 01 May 2000 18:22:11 +0100, Brian Greenfield
><not-for-replies@zombie.org.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:56:03 +0100, Russell Jepson
>><russell@no-spam.sb-solutions.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>whilst downloading a large file last week I was alerted by atguard that
>>>an inbound UDP packet from 212,159,70,49,pc-anywhere-status which I
>>>blocked.
>>>
>>>was this an attempt to break in,
>>
>>I've had similar connection attempts when connected to BTi.
>>Many of them are malicious, but some just appear to be
>>various programs on the lookout for other machines connected
>>to the same network. It looks to me as if that is what
>>happened here.
>>
>
>What sort of problems can these malicious attacks cause?

None (touch wood). They don't get past my firewall.

I used to see many, many back orrifice & netbus probes, but
I haven't had any of these for a few weeks. Port 2140
(either deep throat or the invasor, according to my list) is
the port of the week.
-- 
You're reading this in a newsgroup because that's where I posted it.
That's where I'd like to read your reply too.   DON'T MAIL AND POST!

But, if you really want to reply by email, my reply-to *IS* valid ;)