🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #34213

Re: SCSI terminator required

#34213
From: Roger J.Hamlett
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 00:00
43 lines
2488 bytes
In article: <AdJ90OA8qcH3EwdF@dbqa.demon.co.uk>  Tom Bird 
<hamster@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes:
> 
> In article <661106854wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>, Roger J.Hamlett
> <Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> writes
> >In article: <qN$EETAUs6G3EwwD@dbqa.demon.co.uk>  Tom Bird 
> ><hamster@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes:
> [snip]
> >> What's the difference, active, passive and so on?
> 
> >+5v (TERMPWR)---220ohm---signal---330ohm---GND
> 
> >+5v(TERMPWR)---2.85v regulator---110ohm---signal
> 
> >This gives a large degree of immunity to noise and droop on the 
> >termpwr line, and a better impedance 'match'. Active is _required_ 
on 
> >any bus using the 20MHz signalling rates (ultra), and recommended 
> >even at the 10MHz 'Fast SCSI-2' rates. I can make a suprising 
> >difference to bus reliability...
> 
> Thanks for the information.
> 
> The SCSI bus inside my main PC is terminated by a CD-ROM, would 
this be
> active termination?  It does have a 10MHz device (hard drive) and 
will
> shortly (probably) get another one, most likely a 7200RPM 20MHz 
device.
Probably not...
Depends on the CD, but many of these have passive terminators. 
Conversely devices like HD's, have tended to come with active 
termination for quite a while. I know only a few, but if you give the 
make and model, somebody may be able to say if your CD has active or 
passive termination.

Best Wishes

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| EMail roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk  http://www.ttelmah.demon.co.uk/ |
| A beard! A beard! cried Fly Nicholas.'By God, that's a good one!'|
| (Chaucer)                                                        |
Technical Details
Message-ID: <509552443wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <h7KmZCAAjMG3Ewzx@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <KNhhHLA1DbG3EwEV@jasper.demon.co.uk> <qN$EETAUs6G3EwwD@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <661106854wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> <AdJ90OA8qcH3EwdF@dbqa.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,62816d173fa57729
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk (Roger J.Hamlett)
Subject: Re: SCSI terminator required
Date: 1999/04/21
Message-ID: <509552443wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 469263086
References: <h7KmZCAAjMG3Ewzx@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <KNhhHLA1DbG3EwEV@jasper.demon.co.uk> <qN$EETAUs6G3EwwD@dbqa.demon.co.uk> <661106854wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> <AdJ90OA8qcH3EwdF@dbqa.demon.co.uk>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!finch-post-11.mail.demon.net![158.152.142.84]
X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 924726091 mail2news:29231 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk
Organization: Myorganisation
Reply-To: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: demon.tech.pc