Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #34307Re: Ethernet Cable Length
From: Roger J.Hamlett
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 00:00
52 lines
3072 bytes
3072 bytes
In article: <y$4ObJAcKIG3EwQE@ch-w.demon.co.uk> John Chapple <jc@ch-w.demon.co.uk> writes: > > In article <a$YK1FBq1FG3Ewks@jasper.demon.co.uk>, Mike Tomlinson > <mike@jasper.demon.co.uk> writes > >You will be highly unlikely to be able to terminate the cable yourself > >due to the special tools needed, but many cable installation companies > >are happy to test and terminate an already-installed cable (which is > >what I used to do - get the cable laid, then get in a firm to terminate > >and test it.) > Does it *really* take an engineer something like 15 minutes to terminate > an optical cable, (I understand it's quite a slow process, sticking the > end in some sort of resin then smoothing it off with many? different > grades of some sort of abrasive (apparently theres no quick solution))? This depends on the fibre. For short runs (several hundred metres), there are simpler solutions, using 'plastic' fibre, where the ends can be cut and polished in only a few seconds. However on longer runs the attenuation of these is relatively poor, and glass fibres have to be used. The ends have to be at right angles, and polished, and this takes time. 'Better' polishing equipment reduces the time, and it is usually easier to do this 'off site', where automated equipment can do an end much cheaper. > Not really related to subject, but, I understand that on an ethernet > network if utilization goes above 25% this is regarded as 'a bad thing' > (whatever that means) my 3com hub has peaked at 80% whilst installing a > sp over the network on 2machines, just using netbeui BTW. Would this be > a matter of concern on a real network? It depends on the nature of the traffic. For instance you could have a 'point-point' network connection, and run at 80% with no problems at all. However in normal networks high utilisation, tends to imply collisions, and these are what really cause the problems... Best Wishes -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- | EMail roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk http://www.ttelmah.demon.co.uk/ | | A beard! A beard! cried Fly Nicholas.'By God, that's a good one!'| | (Chaucer) |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<566707313wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7ww24BAvpgD3MA5U@electrue.co.uk> <19phlVAiOHF3Ew4r@jasper.demon.co.uk> <SF4egDA2MhF3EwfX@howgarth.demon.co.uk> <a$YK1FBq1FG3Ewks@jasper.demon.co.uk> <y$4ObJAcKIG3EwQE@ch-w.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,5bf495d5beca8be8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk (Roger J.Hamlett) Subject: Re: Ethernet Cable Length Date: 1999/04/18 Message-ID: <566707313wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 467903865 References: <7ww24BAvpgD3MA5U@electrue.co.uk> <19phlVAiOHF3Ew4r@jasper.demon.co.uk> <SF4egDA2MhF3EwfX@howgarth.demon.co.uk> <a$YK1FBq1FG3Ewks@jasper.demon.co.uk> <y$4ObJAcKIG3EwQE@ch-w.demon.co.uk> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!tele-post-20.mail.demon.net![158.152.142.84] X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 924433886 mail2news:29874 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk Organization: Myorganisation Reply-To: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: demon.tech.pc